DOI: 10.17760/d20004841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experience of contrasting learning styles, learning preferences, and personality types in the community college English classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with Xu, et al (2018), the study of Kudinov et al (2018) [58] identifies types of axiological orientations in students' personalities, highlighting the people's types of value-semantic orientations as pragmatic-professional, social-communicative, and individual-egoistic. A personality type could identify associated learning preferences or styles according to various studies, in which have people were observed in different learning situations to understand the way they chose to learn and ascertain that there are types that lean towards distinctive learning style preferences that cannot be clarified by other factors [59]. A study by Dosch (2006) determined an effective approach to teaching clinical dentistry in an attempt to identify the most communal personalities among undergraduate dental students and their learning preferences [60].…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with Xu, et al (2018), the study of Kudinov et al (2018) [58] identifies types of axiological orientations in students' personalities, highlighting the people's types of value-semantic orientations as pragmatic-professional, social-communicative, and individual-egoistic. A personality type could identify associated learning preferences or styles according to various studies, in which have people were observed in different learning situations to understand the way they chose to learn and ascertain that there are types that lean towards distinctive learning style preferences that cannot be clarified by other factors [59]. A study by Dosch (2006) determined an effective approach to teaching clinical dentistry in an attempt to identify the most communal personalities among undergraduate dental students and their learning preferences [60].…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current offerings are usually relatively standard without any differentiation; as such, they are not necessarily pedagogically beneficial if each individual student's level of knowledge and preferred learning style is unknown. Existing research into learning styles indicates that incorporating an understanding of a student's learning style in the instruction provided enhances the success of learning experiences [23]. As such, creating learning materials that can be adapted to a student's preferred learning style represents a powerful means of personalizing education that delivers optimal results.…”
Section: Research On Learning Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Felder-Silverman learning style dimensions are neither original nor comprehensive. For example, the first-dimension sensing / intuition is one of four dimensions of a well-known model based on Jung's theory of psychological types [23]. The fourth dimension active/reflective processing is a component of a learning style model developed by Kolb [24].…”
Section: Index Of Learning Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSQ is not the first approach aiming to utilise the MBTI model with respect to children and adolescents. (Kiersay, 1998;Lawrence, 1993). What the SSQ does differently, is to re-name some type descriptors to promote clarity and improve communication, more user-friendly, more congruent with everyday language (Oakland, Horton, & Glutting, 1996).…”
Section: •Temperament Research In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%