“…The majority (19/22) of studies employed a qualitative design (Ang et al., 2019; Asiedu et al., 2018; Bjuresäter et al., 2012; Brotherton et al., 2006; Cohen et al., 2012; Green et al., 2019a, 2019b; Halliday et al., 2017; Jukic et al., 2017; Mayre‐Chilton et al., 2011; Mori et al., 2019; Orrevall et al., 2005; Penner et al., 2012; Rickman, 1998; Sezer et al., 2020; Smith et al., 1993; Sowerbutts et al., 2020; Stavroulakis et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2021) and three were mixed methods (Fuhr & Ciachi, 2019; Kurien et al., 2017; Rickman, 1998). Data were collected predominantly through interviews (19/22) (Ang et al., 2019; Asiedu et al., 2018; Bjuresäter et al., 2012; Brotherton et al., 2006; Cohen et al., 2012; Fuhr & Ciachi, 2019; Green et al., 2019a, 2019b; Halliday et al., 2017; Kurien et al., 2017; Orrevall et al., 2005; Penner et al., 2012; Rickman, 1998; Sezer et al., 2020; Smith et al., 1991; 1993; Sowerbutts et al., 2020; Stavroulakis et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2021) and focus groups (3/22) (Jukic et al., 2017; Mayre‐Chilton et al., 2011; Mori et al., 2019). One study used a photo‐elicitation interviewing method (Asiedu et al., 2018), and one supplemented interviews with observations of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) feeding practices (Sezer et al., 2020).…”