The Experiences and Perceptions of Health-Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Muscat, Oman: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Introduction Predominantly, studies on COVID-19 report quantitative data that often miss the social implications and other determinants of health. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of health care workers (HCWs) in primary health care in the management of COVID-19 with respect to medical response experiences, socio-cultural and religious reforms, psychological impressions, and lessons learned. Methods This was a qualitative study using an empirical phenomenological approach. Six focus group discussions were conducted across various stakeholders working frontline in the management of COVID-19 (managerial, public health/field/community and primary care health centers). They participated in semi-structured, in-depth group discussions from 11th to 20th May 2020. All discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Forty participants were involved in this study. Three themes emerged related to the medical response experiences, including the rapid re-structuring of the PHC services, use of technology and challenges of working on COVID-19. Perceptions on the socio-cultural and religious reforms included changes in social and religious norms, and anticipated gaps in accessing health care among the vulnerable groups (elderly, expatriates, and individuals with low economic status). Perceptions on psychological disturbances were themed as consequences of social distancing, management of dead bodies, exhaustion among the health care workers, and risk of exposure. Finally, lessons learned were centered around building on the existing epidemiological and public health capacities, improving access to health care and overcoming resistance to change. Most participants labelled their experience in COVID-19 as an “experience of wisdom” in which learning was a continuous process. Conclusion This qualitative study amongst primary HCWs revealed certain aspects of response to COVID-19 in Muscat, Oman. Results has unfolded various aspects of COVID-19. The situation was perceived by primary HCWs as a new experience that challenged the primary health care; enforced the utilization of public health/epidemiological skills, and linked to unfavorable socio-religious and psychological events.

Transformation of primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of healthcare professionals in eight European countries

“… 7 A limited number of studies report the views of PCPs but these are confined to a single country’s experiences. 4 , 10 – 12 In this study this gap is addressed by investigating how PCPs in different European countries responded during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the aim of understanding the key ingredients behind successful rapid transformation and adaptation of primary care to inform this ongoing crisis and any future crisis in care delivery.…”

The organisational and managerial challenges experienced by nurses recovered from COVID‐19: A phenomenological study

“…Nurses provide their daily nursing care in addition to caring for infected or suspected cases of COVID‐19 (Peng et al, 2020 ). In these circumstances, they are both in the front line of caring for infected patients and fighting against the disease and thus incurring the risk of infection and are also faced with many problems and challenges (Al Ghafri et al, 2020 ). Based on literature, nurses may experience moral distress, long work hours and fatigue in addition to psychological problems.…”

“…Meanwhile, there are also organisational challenges that are not under the control of nurses but that impact them. These include a shortage of nursing force, heavy workloads and shortage of personal protective equipment (Al Ghafri et al, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Rezaee et al, 2020 ).…”

‘Surviving to Thriving’: A Meta-Ethnography of the Experiences of Healthcare Staff Caring for Persons With COVID-19

“…To synthesise the data, codes in the form of rst and second order constructs were formulated from each primary study. These codes were organized into categories through a process of constant comparison across the studies (31). This facilitated either translation of the studies into one another (areas of agreement across the studies) or refutational synthesis (areas of disagreement across the studies) based on the emerging categories.…”

“…Following the translation process, the categories were re-interpreted to formulate overarching concepts/ metaphors. These overarching concepts/ metaphors formed the basis for undertaking a narrative synthesis (31). The interpretive process was iterative with reference to the primary studies.…”