1983
DOI: 10.1109/mper.1983.5519007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Experimental Determination of Coal Mill Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Breakage matrix is considered to simulate the grinding process. Some relatively simplified models of mills are developed in [129,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147], where the coal in the pulverizer is divided into two groups, unpulverized and pulverized. These detailed and simplified models can be used for mill FDD purpose.…”
Section: Mill Fault Detection Using Quantitative Model-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Breakage matrix is considered to simulate the grinding process. Some relatively simplified models of mills are developed in [129,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147], where the coal in the pulverizer is divided into two groups, unpulverized and pulverized. These detailed and simplified models can be used for mill FDD purpose.…”
Section: Mill Fault Detection Using Quantitative Model-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though results look interesting and show quick fault detection, these methods focus on one or two faults only. Detailed and complete models developed in [129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147] should be tried with the aim of multiple fault identification.…”
Section: Comparison Of Various Fault Diagnostic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (4) represents that the mass change rate of the coal in mill is proportional to the difference between the coal flow into the mill and the fraction of coal that is converted into pulverized fuel K 1 5M c (t). Equation (5) represents that the change of mass of pulverized fuel in mill is proportional to the difference between the fraction of coal converted into pulverized and the pulverized coal flow outlet from the mill. Equation (6) represents that the total amount of mill current consumed to run the mill motor is equal to the sum of mill current required to grind over surface area, mill current to pulverized coal, and mill current to run empty mill.…”
Section: Coal Mill Modeling For the Normal Grinding Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The milling process at power plants is different from the grinding process in mineral industry as it involves not only grinding but also heat transferring. An approximated linear transfer function model was obtained by Bollinger and Snowden in 1983 [5]. Mill modeling achieved by a system identification method was reported in 1984 [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the vertical mills, tube-ball mills are more complex in structure and have a much higher grinding capacity. The modeling procedure adopted in the paper is different from the work reported in [2], [3], [7], [8], and [9]. The mathematical model is transparent with the respect to engineering process as all the parameters of the model have their specified physics meaning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%