2011
DOI: 10.7212/zkufbd.v1i1.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Experimental Investigation of The Effect of Machining Parameters on Burr Formation in Drilling of AISI D2 and AISI D3 Cold Work Steels

Abstract: Bu çalışmada, Bilgisayarlı Sayısal Denetimli (BSD) freze tezgâhında boydan boya delik delme sürecinde değişen işleme parametrelerinin, delik sonu çıkışında çapak oluşumuna etkisi incelenmiştir. Deneysel çalışmalarda; iki farklı sertlikteki soğuk iş takım çeliği (AISI D2, 20 HRC ve AISI D3, 28 HRC), iki farklı çap (Ø 8 mm ve Ø 10 mm) ve dört farklı uzunlukta HSS matkap uçlarıyla delinmiştir. Deneylerde üç farklı kesme hızı (5, 10 ve 15 m/dak) ve üç farklı ilerleme hızı değeri (0.04, 0.05 ve 0.06 mm/dev) değerle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With feed upto 0.09 mm/rev, surface finish improves due to fact that the uncut chip thickness becomes very small which might give rise to the ploughing (led to material side flow), instead cutting of material at lower feeds relative to higher feeds, as reported by Rech & Moisan (2003) and Bartarya and Choudhury (2012). Nevertheless, more increase in feed, the contact length between the workpiece and the tool increases (Kaplan et al 2014;Hessainia et al 2015) and hence resulting in high thrust force (Nayak & Sehgal 2015) since the cutting tool has to extract more volume of material from the workpiece (Das et al 2016;Bouzid et al (2014b); Aouici et al 2014) thereby more vibration and heat generation ) resulting in high Ra values. The experimental results show that average surface roughness are low at higher depth of cut but at a slower rate for which it can be considered as less affecting parameter for surface roughness in the studied range, which could be used to improve productivity if it would not worsen the surface microstructure.…”
Section: Surface Roughness Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…With feed upto 0.09 mm/rev, surface finish improves due to fact that the uncut chip thickness becomes very small which might give rise to the ploughing (led to material side flow), instead cutting of material at lower feeds relative to higher feeds, as reported by Rech & Moisan (2003) and Bartarya and Choudhury (2012). Nevertheless, more increase in feed, the contact length between the workpiece and the tool increases (Kaplan et al 2014;Hessainia et al 2015) and hence resulting in high thrust force (Nayak & Sehgal 2015) since the cutting tool has to extract more volume of material from the workpiece (Das et al 2016;Bouzid et al (2014b); Aouici et al 2014) thereby more vibration and heat generation ) resulting in high Ra values. The experimental results show that average surface roughness are low at higher depth of cut but at a slower rate for which it can be considered as less affecting parameter for surface roughness in the studied range, which could be used to improve productivity if it would not worsen the surface microstructure.…”
Section: Surface Roughness Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the soft-annealed delivery condition, the AISI D2 and AISI D3 steels had hardness values of 20 HRC and 28 HRC, respectively. The chemical composition of the workpiece materials (Table 1) were specified by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis and their physical properties are given in Table 2 [7,27]. Workpieces were prepared in dimensions of 152×52×52 mm, and 1 mm of chip was removed in a milling machine from all outer surfaces of the workpieces before the machinability tests in order to prevent the tests from being affected by hardening of the outer surface layers and inclined surfaces.…”
Section: Materials and Methods 21 Workpiecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional drilling procedure, being economical and easily applicable, is one of the preferred machining methods in the manufacture of various industrial products. When turning and milling operations are compared with drilling operations, the kinematic and dynamic structures are similar, and the chip flow and distribution of cutting temperatures are the same [1]. On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to the drilling operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations