The experts speak: The critical ingredients of strengths model case management.

Marty, Doug; Rapp, Charles A.; Carlson, Linda

doi:10.1037/h0095090

Cited by 40 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A move from a deficits approach towards a strengths approach, as has been initiated in the strengths model for mental health case management, should be considered for individuals with ABI [60,61]. This approach to therapy can aid to develop a collaborative therapeutic alliance between the therapist and the individual with ABI.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Returning to productive activities: Perspectives of individuals with long-standing acquired brain injuries

Petrella¹,

McColl²,

Krupa³

et al. 2005

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Returning to productive activities: Perspectives of individuals with long-standing acquired brain injuries

Petrella¹,

McColl²,

Krupa³

et al. 2005

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…First, like other expert surveys (Evans and Bond 2008;Marty et al 2001;McGrew et al 1994;Walker and Bruns 2006), importance ratings were skewed toward the positive. The relatively small difference in means of the items makes discrimination between ''criticalness'' of elements difficult.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Experts Rate: Supervisory Behaviors That Impact the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices

Carlson

Rapp

Eichler

2010

Community Ment Health J

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to identify the critical behaviors of supervisors for the successful implementation of evidence-based practice in adult mental health. Experts who work with supervisors to support implementation in three evidence-based practices were surveyed. The three evidence-based practices included Assertive Community Treatment, Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment, and Supported Employment. There was substantial agreement among experts as to the importance of supervisory behaviors in the areas of facilitating team meetings, building and enhancing staff skills, monitoring and using outcomes, and continuous quality improvement activities.

show abstract

“…It assumes that every person can build a meaningful and satisfying life defined by an individual's own terms . Rapp and Goscha (2012, see 'The purpose, principles, and research results' pp.51-69) and F o r P e e r R e v i e w Marty, Rapp, and Carlson (2001) provide a useful account of what constitutes the critical elements of strengths-based intervention approach.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: A critical review

Tse

Tsoi

Hamilton

et al. 2016

Int J Soc Psychiatry

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Background: For the past three decades, mental health practitioners have increasingly adopted aspects and tools of strengths-based approaches. To provide strengths-based intervention and to amplify strengths relies heavily on effective interpersonal processes.Aim: This paper is a critical review of research regarding the use of strengths-based approaches in mental health service settings. The aim is to discuss strengths-based interventions within broader research on recovery, focusing on effectiveness and advances in practice where applicable.Method: A systematic search for peer-reviewed intervention studies published between 2001 and December 2014 yielded 55 articles of potential relevance to the review.Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to appraise the quality of the studies. Our review found emerging evidence that the utilisation of a strengths-based approach improves outcomes including hospitalisation rates, employment/educational attainment, and intrapersonal outcomes such as self-efficacy and sense of hope.Conclusions: Recent studies confirm the feasibility of implementing a highfidelity strengths-based approach in clinical settings and its relevance for practitioners in healthcare. More high quality studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of strengths-based approaches.https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ijspsych International Journal of Social Psychiatry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 AbstractBackground: For the past three decades, mental health practitioners have increasingly adopted aspects and tools of strengths-based approaches. To provide strengths-based intervention and to amplify strengths relies heavily on effective interpersonal processes.Aim: This paper is a critical review of research regarding the use of strengths-based approaches in mental health service settings. The aim is to discuss strengths-based interventions within broader research on recovery, focusing on effectiveness and advances in practice where applicable. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to appraise the quality of the studies. Our review found emerging evidence that the utilisation of a strengths-based approach improves outcomes including hospitalisation rates, employment/educational attainment, and intrapersonal outcomes such as self-efficacy and sense of hope. Conclusions:Recent studies confirm the feasibility of implementing a high-fidelity strengths-based approach in...

show abstract

The experts speak: The critical ingredients of strengths model case management.

Cited by 40 publications

References 18 publications

Returning to productive activities: Perspectives of individuals with long-standing acquired brain injuries

Returning to productive activities: Perspectives of individuals with long-standing acquired brain injuries

The Experts Rate: Supervisory Behaviors That Impact the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices

Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: A critical review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About