2016
DOI: 10.4171/jst/135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The exponent in the orthogonality catastrophe for Fermi gases

Abstract: Dedicated to Hajo Leschke on the occasion of his 70 th birthday ABSTRACT. We quantify the asymptotic vanishing of the ground-state overlap of two non-interacting Fermi gases in d -dimensional Euclidean space in the thermodynamic limit. Given two one-particle Schrödinger operators in finitevolume which differ by a compactly supported bounded potential, we prove a power-law upper bound on the ground-state overlap of the corresponding noninteracting N -particle systems. We interpret the decay exponent γ in terms … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let (L n ) n∈N be a sequence of lengths such that L n / e n α → ∞ as n → ∞ for some α > 1. Then, Theorem 2.2 in [GKMO16], see also [GKM14], applies realisationwise to the operators H and H τ for any τ ∈ (0, 1], and we infer that almost surely and for a.e. energy E ∈ J S Ln (E) L −γ(E)/2+o(L 0 n ) n as n → ∞.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let (L n ) n∈N be a sequence of lengths such that L n / e n α → ∞ as n → ∞ for some α > 1. Then, Theorem 2.2 in [GKMO16], see also [GKM14], applies realisationwise to the operators H and H τ for any τ ∈ (0, 1], and we infer that almost surely and for a.e. energy E ∈ J S Ln (E) L −γ(E)/2+o(L 0 n ) n as n → ∞.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…for every n ∈ N. Now, suppose we knew there exists a spectral interval J ⊂ R such that H has absolutely continuous spectrum in J almost surely. It follows from (3.11) and [GKMO16,Thm. 3.4] that, almost surely given any p > 0, 1 (−∞,E] (H L ) − 1 (−∞,E] (H τ L ) p diverges at least logarithmically in L for a.e.…”
Section: A Consequence Of Theorem 31 Ismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is essentially a known statement (see e.g. [Pu,Lemma 4] or [GKMO,Corollary 4.31]). For completeness, we briefly recall the proof.…”
Section: Let πmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…holds and therefore multiplying the latter with its adjoint we obtain . In this situation, the above determinant (2.11) is related to the scalar product of the ground states of two non-interacting fermionic systems at Fermi energy E, see [9] and references cited therein. The above formula can be used to compute this scalar product exactly in cases where the Fermi energy lies in a spectral gap.…”
Section: Remarks 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last years further interest in Fredholm determinants of the form (1.1) emerged in mathematical physics, see [13,8,9,6,14,4]. The determinant (1.1) appears when computing the thermodynamic limit of the scalar product of two non-interacting fermionic many-body ground states filled up to the Fermi energy E ∈ R. In this case, the underlying one-particle operators are given by a pair of Schrödinger operators whose difference is relatively trace class, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%