1981
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.000535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Expression of Isotope Effects on Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
357
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
9
357
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though substrate binding and product release is unchanged in heavy PNP, the probability of chemical barrier crossing for the Michaelis complexes is decreased in both forward commitment and single-turnover experiments. Forward commitment, C f , is the probability of a substrate in the Michaelis complex to pass the chemical barrier relative to its probability of dissociation to free substrate (31). The lowered C f for inosine and guanosine with heavy PNP reflects a decrease in the probability of on-enzyme barrier crossing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though substrate binding and product release is unchanged in heavy PNP, the probability of chemical barrier crossing for the Michaelis complexes is decreased in both forward commitment and single-turnover experiments. Forward commitment, C f , is the probability of a substrate in the Michaelis complex to pass the chemical barrier relative to its probability of dissociation to free substrate (31). The lowered C f for inosine and guanosine with heavy PNP reflects a decrease in the probability of on-enzyme barrier crossing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12-14, c fb and c fc (forward commitments to catalysis for B and C) are , and , respectively, c r (reverse commitment to catalysis) is , and c vf (the catalytic ratio) is (16).…”
Section: Primary Substrate Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our particular case, where the reaction scheme can also be entered via cADPR (step k −& ), if k −% k & one expects that on hydrolysis of the cyclic metabolite the CD38-cADPR complex, which now corresponds to a Michaelis complex, has a high commitment to catalysis. Forward commitment (C f ) to catalysis has been defined as the tendency of the enzyme-substrate complex poised for catalysis to continue forward as opposed to its tendency to partition back into free enzyme and substrate [25]. In the case of a high commitment to catalysis k cat k off ; in Scheme 1 this translates into k −% k & for the catalytic pathway leading to hydrolysis of cADPR, because, in the reactions catalysed by bovine spleen NAD + glycohydrolase, the hydrolytic step (k $ ) is fast compared with the bond cleavage steps [26,27].…”
Section: Commitment To Catalysis Of the Cd38-cadpr Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%