1998
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199809010-00034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Extended Submental Island Lip Flap: An Alternative for Esophageal Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,29,30 However, a high success and low complication rate has been reported for both methods. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The lateral island trapezius myocutaneous flap, 31 the extended submental island flap, 32 and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap 33,34 are reported to be alternative methods for cervical oesophageal reconstruction, and might be suitable also in trauma situations. However, the data available on these procedures for the particular indication of post-traumatic oesophageal repair are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,29,30 However, a high success and low complication rate has been reported for both methods. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The lateral island trapezius myocutaneous flap, 31 the extended submental island flap, 32 and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap 33,34 are reported to be alternative methods for cervical oesophageal reconstruction, and might be suitable also in trauma situations. However, the data available on these procedures for the particular indication of post-traumatic oesophageal repair are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another surgical option for closure is an island submental flap. 12 The majority of the fistulas appear between 7 and 13 postoperative days. In different studies it is 40 postoperative days to 3 months but it is logical to optimize the surgical bed first before surgical repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,29,30 The SAIF may be employed for several purposes, mainly as myocutaneous, but also as fasciocutaneous, osteocutaneous or cutaneous flap, 31 and it has been described for reconstruction of head and neck soft tissue defects of the lower, mid and upper region of the face (which may require division of the facial artery and vein). It has also been used for malar augmentation with fascia flap only, 29,32 reconstruction of defects with hair-bearing skin, 33 tongue and/or floor of mouth defects, buccal mucosa defects, palatal defects, 34 nasal reconstruction, 35 lip reconstruction, [36][37][38] cervical esophagus repair or reconstruction, [39][40][41] hemilaryngectomy defects repair, 31 reconstruction of the neopharynx after total laryngectomy, repair of pharyngocutaneous fistulas 42 and coverage of hardware used in spine surgery. 43 There is controversy in the literature about the oncological safety of the SAIF due to the relationship between the flap and lymph nodes of the Ib region, because these nodal levels might be involved even at an early stage of OSCC, 44,45 and this can increase the risk of recurrence, 44,46,47 as well as hindering a rigorous cervical level I neck dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%