2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4487(01)00033-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The extended track interaction model: supralinearity and saturation He-ion TL fluence response in sensitized TLD-100

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TL fluence response of peaks 5a, 5 and 5b has been measured for 2.6 and 6.8 MeV He ions in both normal and sensitized LiF : Mg,Ti (TLD-100) [10,32]. The behaviour of the TL fluence response of peak 5a compared to peaks 5 and 5b strongly supports the geminate recombination model for peak 5a.…”
Section: He Ion Tl Fluence Response: Interpretation Using the Extendementioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The TL fluence response of peaks 5a, 5 and 5b has been measured for 2.6 and 6.8 MeV He ions in both normal and sensitized LiF : Mg,Ti (TLD-100) [10,32]. The behaviour of the TL fluence response of peak 5a compared to peaks 5 and 5b strongly supports the geminate recombination model for peak 5a.…”
Section: He Ion Tl Fluence Response: Interpretation Using the Extendementioning
confidence: 60%
“…The basic idea of the UNIM is that the linear response at low dose arises from geminate recombination in a localized entity. For gamma rays and electrons, the localized entity is the coupled/spatially correlated TC/LC pair [22,[30][31][32]. Note that the supralinearity is not present in LiF : Mg,Cu,P (a linear/saturating dose response is observed- figure 14) due to the absence of Ti and, consequently, the lack of formation of the TC/LC coupled pairs.…”
Section: Non-linear Effects In the Tl Dose Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conversion efficiency of peak 5, CE 5 , is similarly defined except that peak 5a intensities are replaced by peak 5 intensities. (ii) The lack of an increase in the sensitivity of glow peak 5a following 2.6 MeV and 6.8 MeV He ion irradiation in "sensitized" material compared to the factor two increase in the sensitivity of peak 5; (S/S 0 ) 5a = 0.86 ± 0.12, compared to (S/S 0 ) 5 = 2.0 ± 0.2 15 . Sensitization of peak 5 to gamma rays is obtained by gamma irradiation to a dose level of 1000Gy (believed to completely populate/deactivate the competing centres) followed by a 280 o C anneal for 30 minutes to depopulate peak 5 traps and "reset" the material or at least the low temperature trapping/recombination configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The sublinear/saturation behavior of TL intensity are discussed on the basis of track interaction model (TIM) [33,34]. According to this model the intensity.…”
Section: Thermoluminescencementioning
confidence: 99%