2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17296-5_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Extension Theorem with Respect to Symmetrized Weight Compositions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the symmetrized weight composition, the extension theorem for the case of classical linear codes was proved by Goldberg in [8]. There is a recent result in [7] where the authors proved that if an alphabet has a cyclic socle, then an analogue of the extension theorem holds for the symmetrized weight composition built on arbitrary group. The result was improved in [1] where the author showed, in some additional assumptions, the maximality of the cyclic socle condition for the symmetrized weight composition built on the full automorphism group of an alphabet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the symmetrized weight composition, the extension theorem for the case of classical linear codes was proved by Goldberg in [8]. There is a recent result in [7] where the authors proved that if an alphabet has a cyclic socle, then an analogue of the extension theorem holds for the symmetrized weight composition built on arbitrary group. The result was improved in [1] where the author showed, in some additional assumptions, the maximality of the cyclic socle condition for the symmetrized weight composition built on the full automorphism group of an alphabet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies in particular that these maps are given by monomial matrices. The following result has been proven in a different manner by ElGarem et al [6,Thm. 13] and also appears in [22,Thm.…”
Section: Definition 43 a Weight Functionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…and each side of the identity is a sum of elements in the character group C. Fix r ∈ R n and assume that r is contained in the block P of P R n , U T . Remark 2.1 (6) implies that the character χ( f (• ), r ) must appear on the right hand side of the above identity. In other words, there exists r ′ ∈ P i.e., r ′ = (A r r T ) T for some A r ∈ U , such that χ( f (• ), r ) = χ( • , r ′ ).…”
Section: Proof Let P Be a Block Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], J.A.Wood proved that Frobenius rings do have the extension property with respect to swc. Later, in [4], it was shown that, more generally, a left R-module A has the extension property with respect to swc if it can be embedded in the character group R (given the standard module structure).…”
Section: Definition 13 (Extension Property)mentioning
confidence: 99%