2005
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1005-731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The External RNA Controls Consortium: a progress report

Abstract: Standard controls and best practice guidelines advance acceptance of data from research, preclinical and clinical laboratories by providing a means for evaluating data quality. The External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) is developing commonly agreed-upon and tested controls for use in expression assays, a true industry-wide standard control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
137
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilized the known quantities of RNA spiked-in controls to set a threshold below which we consider the expression readings and transcript assemblies likely unreliable. The spike-in controls used were External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) RNAs (Baker et al 2005). These consist of a set of unlabeled, polyadenylated transcripts of differing sizes and concentrations in order to measure against defined performance criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized the known quantities of RNA spiked-in controls to set a threshold below which we consider the expression readings and transcript assemblies likely unreliable. The spike-in controls used were External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) RNAs (Baker et al 2005). These consist of a set of unlabeled, polyadenylated transcripts of differing sizes and concentrations in order to measure against defined performance criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This final design covered 36.8 Mb and targets both 39 and 59 100-nt termini for 76.4% (206,747) publicly annotated introns or a single terminus for 90.2% (244,125) introns. Additional control probes, including probes targeting all ERCC controls (Baker et al 2005), were included within the design to assess CaptureSeq performance. The final design was manufactured on a Custom Sequence 2.1M Array (Roche/NimbleGen; Cat #05329841001).…”
Section: Capture Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to deal with this is to use a general common reference. 52 To facilitate the comparison of datasets, initiatives have been taken to investigate the differences in array data gathered on different platforms 53 and to agree on a reference standard to facilitate the comparison of data sets. 52 Apart from this, it is important to note that the dissimilarities identified are the results of comparisons made at the level of individual genes.…”
Section: Integration Of Genome-wide Expression Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 To facilitate the comparison of datasets, initiatives have been taken to investigate the differences in array data gathered on different platforms 53 and to agree on a reference standard to facilitate the comparison of data sets. 52 Apart from this, it is important to note that the dissimilarities identified are the results of comparisons made at the level of individual genes. Because subtle changes in single gene expression levels may act in concert to result in significant changes at the pathway level, it may be worthwhile to transcend from the differential expression of individual genes to the identification of important biological processes underlying atherosclerosis.…”
Section: Integration Of Genome-wide Expression Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%