2016
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.138859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The extraordinary joint material of an articulated coralline alga. I. Mechanical characterization of a key adaptation

Abstract: Flexibility is key to survival for seaweeds exposed to the extreme hydrodynamic environment of wave-washed rocky shores. This poses a problem for coralline algae, whose calcified cell walls make them rigid. Through the course of evolution, erect coralline algae have solved this problem by incorporating joints (genicula) into their morphology, allowing their fronds to be as flexible as those of uncalcified seaweeds. To provide the flexibility required by this structural innovation, the joint material of Calliar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the high strain rate experiments conducted in the companion paper (Denny and King, 2016), we estimate that E 2 (at ε=0.2, a strain typical of our cyclical stress-strain experiments) is approximately 27 MPa. From the average creep of genicula in tension (Denny and King, 2016), we estimate (using Eqn 5) that μ 2 is approximately 5×10 12 Pa s, and from stress relaxation tests (Denny and King, 2016), we estimate that μ 1 is approximately 3.9×10 8 Pa s. Through trial and error, we then estimate that E 1 is 40 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the high strain rate experiments conducted in the companion paper (Denny and King, 2016), we estimate that E 2 (at ε=0.2, a strain typical of our cyclical stress-strain experiments) is approximately 27 MPa. From the average creep of genicula in tension (Denny and King, 2016), we estimate (using Eqn 5) that μ 2 is approximately 5×10 12 Pa s, and from stress relaxation tests (Denny and King, 2016), we estimate that μ 1 is approximately 3.9×10 8 Pa s. Through trial and error, we then estimate that E 1 is 40 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These relationships allow us to estimate E 2 and μ 2 in our model using data from experiments regarding stiffness and creep reported in the companion paper (Denny and King, 2016). When the entire model is strained at a sufficiently high rate, both dashpots are 'frozen' and the model's stiffness is due to spring 2 alone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations