2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/aacfe8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The extreme light infrastructure—nuclear physics (ELI-NP) facility: new horizons in physics with 10 PW ultra-intense lasers and 20 MeV brilliant gamma beams

Abstract: The European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) has selected in 2006 a proposal based on ultra-intense laser fields with intensities reaching up to 10-10 W cm called 'ELI' for Extreme Light Infrastructure. The construction of a large-scale laser-centred, distributed pan-European research infrastructure, involving beyond the state-of-the-art ultra-short and ultra-intense laser technologies, received the approval for funding in 2011-2012. The three pillars of the ELI facility are being built in C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
165
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, using the above parameter a 0 =10 in (33) we find a theoretical prediction of the maximal scattering angle larger than the numerically obtained scattering angles, which we attribute to an effective overestimation of a 0 , as discussed above. To correct for this effect, we used the effective laser amplitude a a 0.75 0 eff 0 » , as derived in equations (6), (7). Using this analytically derived correction in (33) we found a q »´rad in reasonable agreement with the numerical simulation (see figure 4(a)).…”
Section: Numerical Benchmarkssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, using the above parameter a 0 =10 in (33) we find a theoretical prediction of the maximal scattering angle larger than the numerically obtained scattering angles, which we attribute to an effective overestimation of a 0 , as discussed above. To correct for this effect, we used the effective laser amplitude a a 0.75 0 eff 0 » , as derived in equations (6), (7). Using this analytically derived correction in (33) we found a q »´rad in reasonable agreement with the numerical simulation (see figure 4(a)).…”
Section: Numerical Benchmarkssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Recent technological advances in ultra-intense laser systems facilitate studies of particle dynamics in electromagnetic fields of unprecedented strength [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In particular, the dynamics of electrons in such ultrastrong fields has been an area of intense research over the past decades [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points corresponding to these results are shown in figure 9(b) by the red dots. The green squares represent semi-theoretical results, that have been obtained by two sequential steps: (i) numerical calculation of the Rayleigh length for the different focal diameters and (ii) transition from the value of D F /z R to the angular width of proton spectra by formula (13). Figure 9(b) also illustrates with the blue line the result of data approximation, this curve is converted into the dashed line for ( ) J D tan 2 exceeding 0.14.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Focal Spot Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, significant progress in short-pulse high-power laser technology has resulted in the development of petawatt-class lasers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], ten petawatt-class lasers [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Even higher power laser systems have been proposed [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unless the pulse duration is as little as a few cycles in length (when radiation 'quenching' is possible [44]), radiation reaction strongly reduces the number of electrons that get close to the maximum possible χ e . This can be mitigated by moving to collisions at oblique incidence, because the spot to which a laser pulse is focussed (∼2 μm) is typically smaller than the length of its temporal profile (20 fs [31], 30 fs [29,30,33] or 150 fs [32]). Even though the maximum possible χ e at θ>0 is smaller than that at θ=0, many more electrons get close to the maximum because the interaction length is shorter and radiative losses are reduced.…”
Section: Enhanced Signatures Of Quantum Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%