PsycEXTRA Dataset 1984
DOI: 10.1037/e574172012-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eye blink and workload considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, visual/structural features of the task can influence the pattern of results, as demonstrated by the EBR data from the stimulus presentation and the feedback period. The first feedback trial of a stage requires increased visual processing of the stimuli, and this can explain the decrease in EBR (see Drew, 1951 ; Stern and Skelly, 1984 ). Similarly, the increase of EBR during stimulus presentation after rule shifts was confounded by the fact that the time of the stimulus presentation was not fixed (as it was terminated by the participant’s response).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, visual/structural features of the task can influence the pattern of results, as demonstrated by the EBR data from the stimulus presentation and the feedback period. The first feedback trial of a stage requires increased visual processing of the stimuli, and this can explain the decrease in EBR (see Drew, 1951 ; Stern and Skelly, 1984 ). Similarly, the increase of EBR during stimulus presentation after rule shifts was confounded by the fact that the time of the stimulus presentation was not fixed (as it was terminated by the participant’s response).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When EBR is measured under a specific task, both increase and decrease of EBR can be observed, as compared to rest periods. Before and after eye-blinks, visual processing is suppressed ( Manning et al, 1983 ; Stevenson et al, 1986 ), and tasks involving visual attention typically decrease EBR ( Drew, 1951 ; Stern and Skelly, 1984 ). Furthermore, several tasks involving mental effort are associated with within-task EBR changes ( Holland and Tarlow, 1975 ; Bentivoglio et al, 1997 ; De Jong and Merckelbach, 1990 ; Siegle et al, 2008 ; Oh et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been commonly agreed in past research that eyeblink, especially endogenous eyeblink, can provide information about the process involved in attention and response programming and execution ( 29 , 30 ). Many studies have reported that blink frequency decreased significantly when subjects were performing tasks associated with heightened visual attention demands ( 31 , 32 ), and the effects were not restricted to visual task modality only. Some other research also found a decrease in the blink frequency of subjects when they were performing nonvisual tasks such as mental arithmetic, digit span, and auditory tracking ( 33 , 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, blinking was also significantly reduced in the EOD condition compared to the EOF condition. Rates of blinking slow with increased task demands and mental engagement, presumably to minimize the risk of missing task-relevant information during eye closure (Drew, 1951;Baumstimler and Parrot, 1971;Stern and Skelly, 1984;Oh et al, 2012). While task demands were not high during these resting state conditions, the reduced rate of blinking in the EOD condition compared to the EOF condition may again reflect a tendency of the visual system to prioritize detection of weak visual input under impoverished visual conditions, consistent with the increase in ␣ peak frequency shown here under conditions of reduced luminance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%