2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eyes test is influenced more by artistic inclination and less by sex

Abstract: The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test was developed by Baron-Cohen and his co-workers. This test provides them the unique opportunity to evaluate social cognition assessing the ability to recognize the mental state of others using only the expressions around the eyes. In healthy populations, however, it has produced conflicting results, particularly regarding sex differences and number of items to use. In this study we performed two studies: The first one investigated the presence of gender effects and the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the reason why people in difficult situations tend to orient their attention toward core facial features, thus facilitating the recognition process. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (RMEt) [12,13] was specifically developed to understand what happens when one must recognize others' mental states only through the expression in the eyes and surrounding region [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason why people in difficult situations tend to orient their attention toward core facial features, thus facilitating the recognition process. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (RMEt) [12,13] was specifically developed to understand what happens when one must recognize others' mental states only through the expression in the eyes and surrounding region [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible explanation for the inconsistent results is the various versions of the RMET used by those studies. The number of items used may explain the conflicting results 20 . The RMET versions used in some studies have been abbreviated versions in which 15 21 , 17 13 , 22 , 20 23 , and 24 24 stimuli were used instead of the usual 36 14 , 25 30 , and the patients were asked to choose between 2 instead of 4 adjectives 21 , 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been inconsistent findings regarding sex differences on the RME with some indication that adult females perform better than adult males (Baron‐Cohen et al, 2015; Guariglia et al, 2015; Vellante et al, 2013). No sex differences were seen on overall RME accuracy in our sample of socioeconomically disadvantaged children and adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%