2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42235-022-00285-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fabrication of Gas-driven Bionic Soft Flytrap Blade and Related Feasibility Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, among several common drive methods, gas drive and electric field drive have ropes, [30][31][32][33][34][35] which limit the usage scenarios and distance of soft robots. Optical drive and thermal drive exhibit slow response time, [14,36] which affects the motion efficiency of the soft robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, among several common drive methods, gas drive and electric field drive have ropes, [30][31][32][33][34][35] which limit the usage scenarios and distance of soft robots. Optical drive and thermal drive exhibit slow response time, [14,36] which affects the motion efficiency of the soft robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool, with its finely tuned structural parameters, showcases a remarkable 12.8% reduction in energy consumption, enhances efficiency by 12.5%, and possesses a cutting force 1.54 times greater than conventional tools [4]. Through studying Venus flytraps' morphology, microstructure, and kinetics, chamber design principles were established and a pneumatic biomimetic blade was successfully created [5], yielding commendable results. Jia's [6] analysis of locust mandible tooth shapes culminated in the creation of a biomimetic saw blade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%