In 2013, the Official Journal of the Federation of Mexico listed the key challenges facing Mexico's judicial institutions: a lack of public trust due to widespread corruption and systematic failure to prosecute and convict criminals (DOF, 2014). A plan to address these issues ensued. Written by the National Conference on the Administration and Enforcement of Justice, this plan consisted of institutional reforms to be carried out by the Mexican judiciary as well as the adoption of new technologies to standardize forensic practices by the police department. Central to the new measures was the proposed consolidation of national biometric databases; chiefly, the automated biometric identification system (ABIS, for fingerprints), the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), and Caramex, otherwise known as La Cara del Mexicano (the Face of the Mexican), a photographic database of faces (see Gobierno de la República, 2015: Serrano et al. 1999). The general objective was to build a new public security system strengthened by technology with the hope that these new databases would help address the inability of the police to catch criminals at both local and federal levels. However, despite these efforts, international reports such as the Global Impunity Index 2020 suggest that these strategies, implemented to improve the judicial system, had little effect (LeCleroq Ortega and Rodríguez Sánchez Lara, 2020, 9-10).In this article, I argue that the failure to improve public security through the use of new technologies should come as no surprise; that is, despite technological developments, realization of justice in Mexico will only be achieved when attention is paid to everyday discriminatory practices by the police-and society in general-and in particular to the role of "race" within those discriminatory practices. Furthermore, it remains unclear how these technologies might themselves contribute to creating or reshaping how race operates in what I call a cryptoracial society-a society where race is absent from official demographic information, resulting in racial ideas being hidden behind other explanations of discrimination, such as class. 1 I argue that in cryptoracial societies, which include other Latin American, European, and some Middle Eastern and Asian societies, the relevance of race and racism in talking about and understanding difference remains hidden, despite race's centrality. In such contexts, new technologies (for example, CODIS, ABIS, or Caramex) can then further obscure the role of race, particularly in policing practices, by introducing a false sense of objectivity.