A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe 2016
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737148.003.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Faces of Modernity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Language emerged as the key organizational principle in the definition of the nation (Angelov, 2016). Bulgarian nationalists (under strong influences from Slavophilism) turned to Russia as an alternative source for educational and cultural resources (Trencsényi et al, 2016). By the 1840s Bulgarian literary tradition became increasingly hostile to Greek influences and reoriented toward Russia (Daskalov, 2013).…”
Section: Bulgaria’s “Other”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language emerged as the key organizational principle in the definition of the nation (Angelov, 2016). Bulgarian nationalists (under strong influences from Slavophilism) turned to Russia as an alternative source for educational and cultural resources (Trencsényi et al, 2016). By the 1840s Bulgarian literary tradition became increasingly hostile to Greek influences and reoriented toward Russia (Daskalov, 2013).…”
Section: Bulgaria’s “Other”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Yugoslav Muslim minority, as the largest non-Christian religious community, presents an interesting case, one that illustrates the limits of religious equality. The language of minority rights, which was prominent during the discussion in Paris and elsewhere in East Central Europe, did not appear out of the blue; rather, it built upon decades of thinking and talking about the “nationality question”, minorities, and the problem of organizing a highly heterogeneous population (Manela, 2007; Weitz, 2008; on the framing of the nationalities question in the nineteenth century, see Case, 2018; Trencsényi et al, 2016: 281–316). The League of Nations was charged with the protection of minorities in the newly established states, and legislation was passed, but the mechanisms of control over its implementation had limited power (Mazower, 1997).…”
Section: Building a Religiously Diverse Democratic Statementioning
confidence: 99%