1926
DOI: 10.1037/h0071020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The factor of speed in intelligence.

Abstract: Except by way of speculation and opinion, 3 the systematic psychology of intelligence remains almost untouched. Observationally one can say little more about intelligence than that it is what the intelligence tests test. So defined we can then go much further and state a variety of psycho-social capacities that depend in a measurable degree upon intelligence as the tests test it, but all this work has brought us little farther toward an understanding of the nature of intelligence, its meaning in psychological … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the simultaneity mechanism is so fundamental, it could have an impact on many aspects of cognition, including performance in tasks without external time constraints. From the current perspective, therefore, Peak and Boring (1926) were correct in suggesting that power tests are not necessarily those that do not involve speed but may simply be those that do not take speed into account.…”
Section: Simultaneity Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because the simultaneity mechanism is so fundamental, it could have an impact on many aspects of cognition, including performance in tasks without external time constraints. From the current perspective, therefore, Peak and Boring (1926) were correct in suggesting that power tests are not necessarily those that do not involve speed but may simply be those that do not take speed into account.…”
Section: Simultaneity Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One useful index in judging the level of psychomotor performance of subjects is reaction time (RT) measurement. [4][5][6][7] Previous studies on adults at high altitudes and on subjects exposed to oxygen deprivation have shown a correlation between the degree of hypoxia and RT scores.7,8 Members of the High Altitude Expedition to Chile in 1935 had a significantly longer and more variable simple RT when tested at an altitude of 20,140 feet than at sea level. No significant change was noted at lower altitudes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to the formulation of the so-called Poisson-Erlang model. The notion of intermediate periods of distraction has already been suggested by many authors, such as Peak and Boring (1926), Bills (1931, 1935, and Berger (1982). The Poisson-Erlang model accounts for short-term variation in the latencies, but not for any long-term trend effect.…”
Section: The Inhibition Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%