Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value 2001
DOI: 10.1057/9780312299064_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The False Coin of Our Own Dreams, or the Problem of the Fetish, IIIb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
238
1
18

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
238
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some certainly do appear to be of the same general size in burial assemblages, there was not one general standardized size throughout the Maya lowlands. Proskouriakoff (1974:18) notes that “[j]ade beads do not seem to have been standardized in size, as we might expect if they were used as money, but, on the other hand, the fact that matched assemblages are very rare suggest that they were often bought and circulated singly and were not always manufactured for specific use.” We can see here that Proskouriakoff questions the idea of true fungibility of jade beads, but also does not support the idea that they were specific types of objects in Graeber's (2001) terms, as earflares and plaques may have been. Kovacevich (2007) has argued elsewhere that spherical jade beads at Cancuen were different in size between elite and commoner contexts and that this relationship was statistically significant.…”
Section: Commodity Candidacy Of Maya Jadescontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although some certainly do appear to be of the same general size in burial assemblages, there was not one general standardized size throughout the Maya lowlands. Proskouriakoff (1974:18) notes that “[j]ade beads do not seem to have been standardized in size, as we might expect if they were used as money, but, on the other hand, the fact that matched assemblages are very rare suggest that they were often bought and circulated singly and were not always manufactured for specific use.” We can see here that Proskouriakoff questions the idea of true fungibility of jade beads, but also does not support the idea that they were specific types of objects in Graeber's (2001) terms, as earflares and plaques may have been. Kovacevich (2007) has argued elsewhere that spherical jade beads at Cancuen were different in size between elite and commoner contexts and that this relationship was statistically significant.…”
Section: Commodity Candidacy Of Maya Jadescontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Appadurai (1986:11) argued that there should be no such distinction, that anything that is intended for exchange is a commodity, and that we should look at the life history of objects to see that a commodity is not a certain type of thing, but a phase in the life of a thing (Appadurai 1986:17). Graeber (2001:33) has critiqued both Appadurai and Kopytoff, as they emphasize the social life of the thing in its importance to value but also define their terms in such a way that it becomes difficult to consider that an object's biography could itself contribute to its value (although cf. Appadurai 1994).…”
Section: Maya Jades As Commodities and Giftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Value is the social construction of what is good, proper, or desirable and is defined by and dependent on the community in question. 26 For the community using Tidepool, a non-profit open source data platform that collects data from individuals living with type 1 diabetes, the value of personal data lies in the potential to enhance diabetes management and therefore improve the health of individuals. In the Our Data Helps community, personal data took on a twofold valorisation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Munn, value is not just another word for shared importance, nor does it denote congealed labour, as in Marx's famous formulation. Rather, Munn defines value as the potential of actions to produce (positive or negative) transformations in the world (see also Graeber 2001: 43–7). Embodied qualities then evidence those socially recognized potentials (an example in her ethnographic context of Gawa is lightness indexing positive potential and heaviness indexing negative potential).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%