PCR procedures based on 16S rDNA gene sequence specific for seven Eubacterium spp. and Eggerthella lenta that predominate in the human intestinal tract were developed, and used for direct detection of these species in seven human feces samples. Three species of Eggerthella lenta, Eubacterium rectale, and Eubacterium eligens were detected from seven fecal samples. Eubacterium biforme was detected from six samples. It was reported that E. rectale, E. eligens, and E. biforme were difficult to detect by traditional culture method, but the nested PCR method is available for the detection of these species. This result shows that the nested PCR method utilizing a universal primer pair, followed by amplification with species-specific primers, would allow rapid detection of Eubacterium species in human feces.Key words: Species-specific primers, Nested PCR, Fecal floraIntestinal microflora in humans and animals is extremely complex and consists of several microorganisms, including anaerobes and aerobes (9). Although the genus Eubacterium isolated from human feces comprises several species of the predominant microorganisms (I), the isolation and identification of these species is very difficult (3). The traditional methods for identifying fecal bacteria include various culture techniques, bacteriological isolations, morphological examination, and biochemical tests. These methods are extremely laborintensive and time-consuming. In addition, they sometimes cannot distinguish the bacteria at the species level. In order to study such a complex species effectively, it is necessary to have quick and accurate method for identification of these species.In contrast, a rapid identification method using a PCR-based system (12) is very available. Previously, we have used the PCR procedure (4, 5) for identifying Collinsella (former genus name, Eubacterium) aerofadens and Eggerthella (former genus name, Eubacterium) lenta (13).In this study, we designed specific primers for another seven Eubacterium species; Eubacterium limosum, (8), and checked their specificity for each taxonomically related microorganism. Furthermore, we tried to identify each of these predominant Eubacterium species from direct fecal samples. The species-specific primers used in this study are listed in Table I. These primers were designed by comparing each 16S rRNA gene sequence with related species from GenBank or our own sequence data. We designed the species-specific primers so that the G +C content was about 50% and the number of bases about 20. Suspending the cultured colony in distilled water, heating at 100 C for 5 min and then cooling prepared bacterial DNA. Fresh feces were collected from healthy humans and analyzed by PCR. The fecal sample preparation method was that referred to in Wang et aI (14). The annealing temperatures used were 60 C or 63 C and cycle numbers were 25. The amplification was performed using a positive control and negative control by the PCR method. After PCR, an 8~I aliquot of amplified sample from each PCR tube was electro...