1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1963.00187.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Family Rorschach: A New Method for Studying Family Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivation.-On the motivation scale, mean scores were as follows: NS, 3.82; WS, 4.18; and NC, 4.27. The differences were not significant, indicating that the three groups were motivated about equally.…”
Section: Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivation.-On the motivation scale, mean scores were as follows: NS, 3.82; WS, 4.18; and NC, 4.27. The differences were not significant, indicating that the three groups were motivated about equally.…”
Section: Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Rorschach and the Thematic Apperception Test were developed for use with individuals, these projective tests have also been employed to gather information about family functioning and dynamics (Goldstein et al, 1970;Kadushin et al, 1971;Levy & Epstein, 1964;Loveland et al, 1963;Sohler et al, 1956;Winter & Ferreira, 1970;Winter et al, 1965Winter et al, , 1966. More recently, family clinicians have developed a number of projective procedures designed specifically for use with family systems, for example, The Marbles Test (Usandivaras et al, 1967) and Kinetic Family Drawings (Burns & Kaufman, 1970), and a variety of spatially focused, symbolic figure placement procedures have been developed to assess family cohesion.…”
Section: Review By Dennis a Bagarozzimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, researchers and clinicians began to structure the observational situation more, using a structured interview in which families were asked the same questions in the same manner (Jackson, 1963;Olson, 1968;Riskin, 1964;Riskin & Faunce, 1970;Sojit, 1969), using a family task in which members were given a verbal task (Elbert, Rosman, Minuchin, & Guerney, 1964;Goodrich & Boomer, 1963;Loveland, Wynne, & Singer, 1963) or a largely nonverbal task, such as playing (Moustakas, Sigel, & Schalock, 1956;Schulman, Shoemaker, & Moelis, 1962), or using a combination of these methods (Addario & Rodgers, 1974;Drechsler & Shapiro, 1963;Ferreira, Winter, & Poindexter, 1966).…”
Section: Assessment Of Families In Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loveland et al (1963) used Rorschach cards for this purpose, while Ferreira et al (1966) used Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) cards in addition to a family questionnaire. Elbert et al (1964) also used a projective technique, the Family Interactio~ Apperception Test, but asked members to respond to it individually, while assessing patterns of family interaction by observing the family discussing and answering six questions.…”
Section: Assessment Of Families In Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%