1991
DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(91)90058-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fast Field Program (FFP). A second tutorial: Application to long range sound propagation in the atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4] In addition, some publications have dealt with theoretical verification and modification of models of this type and comparison with other types of models. [5][6][7][8][9] FFP models have proven to give satisfactory results for a variety of propagation conditions and for sources of different nature. Lowfrequency sound propagation has been studied by some authors, e.g., Robertson et al ͑1995͒ 10 who presented parabolic approximation predictions of pure-tone frequencies from 40 to 160 Hz out to 3 km and compared with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[1][2][3][4] In addition, some publications have dealt with theoretical verification and modification of models of this type and comparison with other types of models. [5][6][7][8][9] FFP models have proven to give satisfactory results for a variety of propagation conditions and for sources of different nature. Lowfrequency sound propagation has been studied by some authors, e.g., Robertson et al ͑1995͒ 10 who presented parabolic approximation predictions of pure-tone frequencies from 40 to 160 Hz out to 3 km and compared with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is the case for approaches based on the fast field program (FPP) and parabolic equations (PE), which have been used extensively to study acoustic propagation. [6][7][8] Such approaches provide approximate solutions to the wave equation, and suffer from limitations due both to the resolution technique, e.g., FFP is limited to horizontally homogeneous problems while PE methods have angular limitations, and to the wave equation itself, in particular its linearity. It should be noted that recently developed non-linear parabolic equations 9 alleviate the latter problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed for applications in underwater acoustics, several computational methods for modelling acoustic environments have been adapted and successfully applied (Gilbert & Di, 1993;Salomons, 2001;West, Gilbert, & Sack, 1992;West, Sack, & Walden, 1991) to atmospheric acoustic problems over several years. The fast-field program (FFP) (West et al, 1991), Crank-Nicholson parabolic equation (CNPE) (West et al, 1992), and Green's function parabolic equation (GFPE) (Gilbert & Di, 1993) are among the most extensively studied atmospheric acoustic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fast-field program (FFP) (West et al, 1991), Crank-Nicholson parabolic equation (CNPE) (West et al, 1992), and Green's function parabolic equation (GFPE) (Gilbert & Di, 1993) are among the most extensively studied atmospheric acoustic models. Using any of these techniques, the calculated TL values are generally accepted as reliable (Attenborough et al, 1995), but the computational resources required to compute these TL values is highly variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%