The fast neutron fluence and the activation monitor activities are routinely calculated with TORT deterministic code and BUGLE-B7 nuclear data library with 47 broad energy groups. The objective of the paper is to analyse options to improve reactor dosimetry transport calculations. There are two paths to improve reactor dosimetry calculations. Increasing geometry, angular and energy mesh size is applicable for TORT code while using newer nuclear data libraries is relevant for both deterministic and Monte Carlo codes. Two new calculation options (improved TORT and Monte Carlo MCNP6) were compared with the standard TORT calculation for VVER-440 Dukovany Unit 3 Cycle 31. The fast neutron fluence with 0.5 MeV threshold as well as activity of Fe. Ni, Ti, Cu. Mn and Nb monitors were evaluated. Standard TORT calculations were improved from S16P3 to S30P3 with three times finer axial mesh size. 120° core symmetry r-ϑ mesh size with 0.5° step and fine multigroup libraries VUAMIN-B7 with 199 neutron energy groups and ENDF/B-VH.1 with 200 neutron energy groups. Both ENDFB and IRDFF activation cross sections were used. The drawback of expanded mesh size is raised calculation runtime since TORT deterministic code is not parallelized and one calculation can require multiple weeks of CPU time. An alternative option of using MCNP6 Monte Carlo code with continuous ENDF/B-VH.1 nuclear data with detailed 3-D geometry and pin-wise effective neutron source prepared by MOBY-DICK diffusion code reactor analysis wras explored. It was found that using finer mesh size affects reactor dosimetry’ tallies less than the choice of nuclear data library. BUGLE-B7 and VTTAMIN-B7 produce results typically within 1% difference. ENDF/B-VH.1 calculations with 200 neutron energy’ groups with TORT code are even in better agreement with MCNP6 calculations with continuous nuclear data libraries. The largest differences of around 2% were observed between VTTAMIN-B7 library based onENDFB-VH.O nuclear data and ENDF/B-VH.1 library. Nuclear data library’ has larger impact on the results with up to 7 % difference between all 0.5 MeV fast neutron fluence calculations. The largest intact of nuclear data was observed for Mn(n.2n) monitor.