2017
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fat but Fit paradox: what we know and don’t know about it

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
130
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
130
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results do not support the so‐called “Fat but Fit paradox” in relation with CVD risk. In this sense, it has been previously suggested that CRF has the potential to counteract the deleterious effect that weight status exerts on the CVD profile; however, most of these evidence comes from studies conducted in adult population, and the information about the Fat but Fit paradox in children and adolescents is still sparse . Nonetheless, and despite differences in the methodology, regarding the cardiovascular risk factors and the statistical procedures used, our results coincide with those reported recently by Nyström et al, who found that weight status has a larger negative effect on the metabolic profile than low CRF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results do not support the so‐called “Fat but Fit paradox” in relation with CVD risk. In this sense, it has been previously suggested that CRF has the potential to counteract the deleterious effect that weight status exerts on the CVD profile; however, most of these evidence comes from studies conducted in adult population, and the information about the Fat but Fit paradox in children and adolescents is still sparse . Nonetheless, and despite differences in the methodology, regarding the cardiovascular risk factors and the statistical procedures used, our results coincide with those reported recently by Nyström et al, who found that weight status has a larger negative effect on the metabolic profile than low CRF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this sense, it has been previously suggested that CRF has the potential to counteract the deleterious effect that weight status exerts on the CVD profile; however, most of these evidence comes from studies conducted in adult population, and the information about the Fat but Fit paradox in children and adolescents is still sparse. 36 37 , and it is considered a predictor of adiposity in later years. 5,7,38 The physiological mechanisms by which CRF affects adiposity may include the effect that aerobic exercise exerts on the expression and activity of carnitine palmitoyl transferase I (an enzyme that controls the fatty acids movement into the mitochondria), as well as the increase in β-Hydroxy acyl-CoA dehydrogenase protein expression (a key enzyme that regulates fat oxidation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scoring structure, similar to that used in the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy,55 56 could help identify the fitness components/subdomains in need of attention in order to provide appropriate feedback and advice to children about how to best improve their overall physical fitness. In this context, the lowest quintile has extensively been used as a threshold for defining low fitness or unfit youth 57. In prospective cohort studies, this group has been shown to have a disproportionately higher risk for future diseases 58.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ortega and colleagues in a recent editorial summarized concerns regarding the “state of the art” of the called “fat but fit paradox.” Among the gaps related to this paradox is the lack of evidence on its demographic distribution in the general population. For example, it is unclear if physical activity has greater protection against the negative influence of body adiposity on chronic diseases in men than women or in adults than older adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%