2014
DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fate of Abstracts Presented at Annual Meetings of the American Urogynecologic Society from 2007 to 2008

Abstract: Because not all presentations are published, it is questionable whether it is acceptable to cite AUGS abstracts that have not passed a journal's peer review process and to implement their results in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the results of previous reports in the literature, the mean time to publication has been found as 11±4 months and 17±2 months in national and international journals respectively in our study ( 6 , 7 , 8 ) . Nevertheless, we believe that the publication time should be shortened so that the scientific articles provide more actual data when they are accessed by the readers of the journal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar to the results of previous reports in the literature, the mean time to publication has been found as 11±4 months and 17±2 months in national and international journals respectively in our study ( 6 , 7 , 8 ) . Nevertheless, we believe that the publication time should be shortened so that the scientific articles provide more actual data when they are accessed by the readers of the journal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The numbers and characteristics of the general surgical and sub‐specialty abstracts presented at the RACS ASC that are converted to full article publications have not been previously studied. The conversion rates of abstracts into full published papers have been reported for a number of medical and surgical meetings, with rates ranging from 13% to 60%, but only one previous study has examined this for a General Surgery congress . Balasubramanian et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%