2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fate of SARS-COV-2 in WWTPS points out the sludge line as a suitable spot for detection of COVID-19

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
118
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have indicated that 0–50% viruses could be removed by the primary stage of the treatment process depending on the settling time ( Gerba, 1981 ). According to a recent study, SARS-CoV-2 RNA is present in 50% of discharging samples after being allowed to settle down in the primary stage of wastewater treatment ( Balboa et al, 2021 ). This analytical study proclaimed the insufficiency of gravitational settling for the absolute removal of viruses from the wastewater under the primary stage of the wastewater treatment process at a WWTP ( Saawarn and Hait, 2021 ).…”
Section: Approaches To Processes For the Removal Of Sars-cov-2 In Wastewater Processing Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have indicated that 0–50% viruses could be removed by the primary stage of the treatment process depending on the settling time ( Gerba, 1981 ). According to a recent study, SARS-CoV-2 RNA is present in 50% of discharging samples after being allowed to settle down in the primary stage of wastewater treatment ( Balboa et al, 2021 ). This analytical study proclaimed the insufficiency of gravitational settling for the absolute removal of viruses from the wastewater under the primary stage of the wastewater treatment process at a WWTP ( Saawarn and Hait, 2021 ).…”
Section: Approaches To Processes For the Removal Of Sars-cov-2 In Wastewater Processing Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, a study by Arora et al (2020) revealed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the samples that were treated through SBR, AS and MBBR wastewater treatment processes. Notably, considering the COVID-19 pandemic, SBR and MBBR have been proved to be efficient secondary treatment techniques for removing SARS-CoV-2 RNA from the wastewater, according to the latest research of Balboa et al (2021) . Kumar et al (2021) recently reported a reduction in the existence of viruses after upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) for municipal wastewater treatment exceeded the level of 1.5-log 10 , which was also seen in the case of other genomes linked with SARS-CoV-2 RNA.…”
Section: Approaches To Processes For the Removal Of Sars-cov-2 In Wastewater Processing Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Environmental samples Methods Primers or probes [providers]. References Wastewater RT-qPCR N_Sarbeco [Tib-Molbiol (Berlin, Germany)] NIID_2019-nCOV_N [TOYOBO, Japan] Ahmed et al, 2000 Wastewater Sewage sludge RT-qPCR RdRp; N-gene; E-gene [Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA] Balboa et al (2020) Wastewater RT-PCR 2019-nCoV_N1–F • 2019-nCoV_N1-R • 2019-nCoV_N1–P [CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel] Medema et al (2020a) , b Wastewater RT-PCR Fast Start Universal Probe Master, forward and reverse primers including, TaqMan probe [Sigma-Aldrich] Or et al, 2020 Raw wastewater RT-qPCR nucleocapsid N gene [CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel] Wu et al (2020) Raw wastewater RT-qPCR E_Sarbeco_F • E_Sarbeco_P1 • E_Sarbeco_R [Tib-Molbiol (Berlin Germany)] Wurtzer et al (2021) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 Balboa et al thoroughly investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viruses in Spanish WWTPs and suggested that most SARS-CoV-2 viral particles were concentrated in the sludge lines, indicating that the solid fraction of wastewater is a potential hot spot for detecting SARS-CoV-2. 34 Moreover, a systematic assessment of the adsorption behavior of waterborne viruses to solid interfaces has pointed out that electrostatics and the hydrophobic effect of different surfaces favor adsorption of the virus onto different solids. 44 Our findings support these previous studies, 3 , 8 , 32 − 34 which suggest that inclusion of the solid phase in the analysis of wastewater will maximize recovery of viral signals in wastewater and improve its usefulness as a surveillance tool for WBE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 Moreover, a systematic assessment of the adsorption behavior of waterborne viruses to solid interfaces has pointed out that electrostatics and the hydrophobic effect of different surfaces favor adsorption of the virus onto different solids. 44 Our findings support these previous studies, 3 , 8 , 32 − 34 which suggest that inclusion of the solid phase in the analysis of wastewater will maximize recovery of viral signals in wastewater and improve its usefulness as a surveillance tool for WBE. It should be noted that methods of RNA extraction could affect downstream analysis, and its optimization is an ongoing research and development area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%