2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114521002014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The favorable effects of long-term selenium supplementation on regression of cervical tissues and metabolic profiles of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial – Expression of concern

Abstract: The Editor-in-Chief has been alerted to concerns about the integrity of the above article and is investigating the claims. The concerns have also been referred to the Iranian National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Research. This statement will be updated when both investigations have been completed and the authors have been given the opportunity to respond to the outcomes of those investigations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2015) Iran RCT G1, placebo: 35/35 G1, 200 μg Se/d: 35/35 Duration: 8 wk Aged 18–40 yr, with PCOS, before menopause; no use of Se supplements and metformin in the last 3 mo; non‐smokers; no diabetes or hypothyroidism; no special diet, oral conceptive, ovulation induction agents Sex: F Age (yr) G1: 25.7 ± 4.8 G2: 25.4 ± 5.1 BMI (kg/m 2 ) G1: 25.2 ± 4.1 G2: 25.0 ± 3.7 Ethnicity: NR Serum/plasma Se: NR Se dietary intake (μg/day, mean ± SD) (by 3‐d dietary records measured at week 2, 4, 6) G1: 58.5 ± 8.0 G2: 56.1 ± 10.5 Selenised yeast (200 μg Se/d) vs placebo Adherence, pills count (%): > 90% Fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, HOMA‐IR, HOMA‐B at baseline and at 8 wk Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) G1: 5.15 ± 0.39 G2: 4.91 ± 0.52 Fasting insulin (pmol/L) G1: 73.58 ± 59.50 G2: 80.69 ± 42.28 HOMA‐IR G1: 2.78 ± 2.25 G2: 3.00 ± 1.69 HOMA‐B G1: 2.78 ± 2.25 G2: 3.00 ± 1.69 Change from baseline (adjusted for baseline value, age and BMI) Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) G1: 0.05 ± 0.09 G2: −0.29 ± 0.09 p = 0.010 Fasting insulin (pmol/L) G1: 7.32 ± 9.73 G2: −28.09 ± 9.73 p = 0.012 HOMA‐IR G1: 0.38 ± 0.39 G2: −1.11 ± 0.39 p = 0.010 HOMA‐B G1: 3.06 ± 5.97 G2: −17.59 ± 5.97 p = 0.017 Karamali et al. (2015) Iran RCT G1, placebo: 28/28 G2, 200 μg Se/d: 28/28 Duration: 6 mo Aged 18–55 yr, with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1; no history of cervical cancer or other cancers of the lower genital tract; no history of hysterectomy or destructive therapy of the cervix; not pregnant. Sex: F Age (yr) G1: 38.3 ± 9.2 G2: 38.3 ± 9.1 BMI (kg/m 2 ) G1: 28.7 ± 3.9 G2: 28.6 ± 4.0 Ethnicity: NR Serum/plasma Se: NR Se intake: NR Selenised yeast (200 μg Se/d) vs placebo Adherence, pills count (%): > 90% Fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin, HOMA‐IR, HOMA‐B at baseline and 6 mo Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) G1: 89.4 ± 8.3 G2: 94.5 ± 12.1 Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) G1: 12.7 ± 4.4 G2: 13.9 ± 4.5 HOMA‐IR G1: 2.8 ± 1.0 G2: 3.3 ± 1.4 HOMA‐B G1: 48.1 ± 18.2 G2: 48.9 ± 14.0 Change from baseline (adjusted for baseline value, age and BMI) (mean ± SE) Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) G1: 0.3 ± 1.7 G2: −5.9 ± 1.7 p = 0.01 Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) G1: 1.9 ± 1.1 G2: −4.5 ± 1.1 p < 0.001 HOMA‐IR G1: 0.3 ± 0.2 G2: −1.2 ± 0.2 p < 0.001 HOMA‐B G1: 9.7 ± 4.9 G2: −14.7 ± 4.9 p = 0.001 Hosseinzadeh et al. (2016) Iran RCT G1, placebo: 30/27 G2, 200 μg Se/d: 30/26 Duration: 12 wk Aged 18–42 yr, with PCOS; non‐smokers; no congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Cushing's syndrome, androgen‐secreting tumours and hyperprolactinemia; no diabetes, hypo‐ or hyperthyroidism, renal dysfunction, liver disease or cardiovascular disease; no use of medications affecting metabolic and hormonal profile; no use of Se supplement in past 3 mo. Sex: F Age (yr, mean ± SE) G1: 28.90 ± 1.17 G2: 29.23 ± 0.96 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SE) G1: 28.39 ± 0.72 G2: 27.4 ± 0.88 Ethnicity: NR Serum/plasma Se: NR Se intake (μg/d, mean ± SE) (6‐d 24‐h recall) G1: 36.4 ± 2.5 G2: 28.3 ± 3.1 Selenised yeast (200 μg Se/d) vs placebo Adherence, pills count (%): > 90% Fasting serum glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA‐IR at baseline and 12 wk Fasting serum glucose (mg/dL, mean ± SE) G1: 87.11 ± 1.90 G2: 87.34 ± 2.45 Fasting insulin (mU/L, mean ± SE) G1: 10...…”
Section: Appendix D – Evidence Tablesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(2015) Iran RCT G1, placebo: 35/35 G1, 200 μg Se/d: 35/35 Duration: 8 wk Aged 18–40 yr, with PCOS, before menopause; no use of Se supplements and metformin in the last 3 mo; non‐smokers; no diabetes or hypothyroidism; no special diet, oral conceptive, ovulation induction agents Sex: F Age (yr) G1: 25.7 ± 4.8 G2: 25.4 ± 5.1 BMI (kg/m 2 ) G1: 25.2 ± 4.1 G2: 25.0 ± 3.7 Ethnicity: NR Serum/plasma Se: NR Se dietary intake (μg/day, mean ± SD) (by 3‐d dietary records measured at week 2, 4, 6) G1: 58.5 ± 8.0 G2: 56.1 ± 10.5 Selenised yeast (200 μg Se/d) vs placebo Adherence, pills count (%): > 90% Fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, HOMA‐IR, HOMA‐B at baseline and at 8 wk Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) G1: 5.15 ± 0.39 G2: 4.91 ± 0.52 Fasting insulin (pmol/L) G1: 73.58 ± 59.50 G2: 80.69 ± 42.28 HOMA‐IR G1: 2.78 ± 2.25 G2: 3.00 ± 1.69 HOMA‐B G1: 2.78 ± 2.25 G2: 3.00 ± 1.69 Change from baseline (adjusted for baseline value, age and BMI) Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) G1: 0.05 ± 0.09 G2: −0.29 ± 0.09 p = 0.010 Fasting insulin (pmol/L) G1: 7.32 ± 9.73 G2: −28.09 ± 9.73 p = 0.012 HOMA‐IR G1: 0.38 ± 0.39 G2: −1.11 ± 0.39 p = 0.010 HOMA‐B G1: 3.06 ± 5.97 G2: −17.59 ± 5.97 p = 0.017 Karamali et al. (2015) Iran RCT G1, placebo: 28/28 G2, 200 μg Se/d: 28/28 Duration: 6 mo Aged 18–55 yr, with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1; no history of cervical cancer or other cancers of the lower genital tract; no history of hysterectomy or destructive therapy of the cervix; not pregnant. Sex: F Age (yr) G1: 38.3 ± 9.2 G2: 38.3 ± 9.1 BMI (kg/m 2 ) G1: 28.7 ± 3.9 G2: 28.6 ± 4.0 Ethnicity: NR Serum/plasma Se: NR Se intake: NR Selenised yeast (200 μg Se/d) vs placebo Adherence, pills count (%): > 90% Fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin, HOMA‐IR, HOMA‐B at baseline and 6 mo Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) G1: 89.4 ± 8.3 G2: 94.5 ± 12.1 Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) G1: 12.7 ± 4.4 G2: 13.9 ± 4.5 HOMA‐IR G1: 2.8 ± 1.0 G2: 3.3 ± 1.4 HOMA‐B G1: 48.1 ± 18.2 G2: 48.9 ± 14.0 Change from baseline (adjusted for baseline value, age and BMI) (mean ± SE) Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) G1: 0.3 ± 1.7 G2: −5.9 ± 1.7 p = 0.01 Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) G1: 1.9 ± 1.1 G2: −4.5 ± 1.1 p < 0.001 HOMA‐IR G1: 0.3 ± 0.2 G2: −1.2 ± 0.2 p < 0.001 HOMA‐B G1: 9.7 ± 4.9 G2: −14.7 ± 4.9 p = 0.001 Hosseinzadeh et al. (2016) Iran RCT G1, placebo: 30/27 G2, 200 μg Se/d: 30/26 Duration: 12 wk Aged 18–42 yr, with PCOS; non‐smokers; no congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Cushing's syndrome, androgen‐secreting tumours and hyperprolactinemia; no diabetes, hypo‐ or hyperthyroidism, renal dysfunction, liver disease or cardiovascular disease; no use of medications affecting metabolic and hormonal profile; no use of Se supplement in past 3 mo. Sex: F Age (yr, mean ± SE) G1: 28.90 ± 1.17 G2: 29.23 ± 0.96 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SE) G1: 28.39 ± 0.72 G2: 27.4 ± 0.88 Ethnicity: NR Serum/plasma Se: NR Se intake (μg/d, mean ± SE) (6‐d 24‐h recall) G1: 36.4 ± 2.5 G2: 28.3 ± 3.1 Selenised yeast (200 μg Se/d) vs placebo Adherence, pills count (%): > 90% Fasting serum glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA‐IR at baseline and 12 wk Fasting serum glucose (mg/dL, mean ± SE) G1: 87.11 ± 1.90 G2: 87.34 ± 2.45 Fasting insulin (mU/L, mean ± SE) G1: 10...…”
Section: Appendix D – Evidence Tablesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Measures of glucose tolerance were investigated as the primary outcome in three trials (Jamilian et al., 2015; Hosseinzadeh et al., 2016; Raygan et al., 2018) and as secondary outcome in five trials (Richie et al., 2014; Karamali et al., 2015; Mesdaghinia et al., 2017; Jacobs et al., 2019; Tamtaji et al., 2019). Two trials measured FBG among other blood parameters (including markers of antioxidant or inflammatory status, blood lipids) (Hawkes et al., 2008; Navas‐Carretero et al., 2011).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations