2019
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201911968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fe2(NO)2 Diamond Core: A Unique Structural Motif In Non‐Heme Iron–NO Chemistry

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frozen solution EPR spectrum of 2 at 80K showed a slightly rhombic S = 3/2 signal with apparent < g> values of 1.994 and 3.889 (Figure c) as expected for a {FeNO} 7 species. Very similar EPR spectra with similar g values have been reported in the literature for five-coordinate (rhombic) , and six-coordinate (rhombic [refs , ]/axial [refs ,, ]) {FeNO} 7 complexes.). The g x , g y , g z values, and zero field splitting parameters obtained from SQUID fit of 2 were used to fit the EPR spectra to the Spin Hamiltonian using “Spin Software” developed by Andrzej Ozarowski (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frozen solution EPR spectrum of 2 at 80K showed a slightly rhombic S = 3/2 signal with apparent < g> values of 1.994 and 3.889 (Figure c) as expected for a {FeNO} 7 species. Very similar EPR spectra with similar g values have been reported in the literature for five-coordinate (rhombic) , and six-coordinate (rhombic [refs , ]/axial [refs ,, ]) {FeNO} 7 complexes.). The g x , g y , g z values, and zero field splitting parameters obtained from SQUID fit of 2 were used to fit the EPR spectra to the Spin Hamiltonian using “Spin Software” developed by Andrzej Ozarowski (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Reduction potential values ranging from E pc = −1.02 V to −1.14 V (vs Cp 2 Fe + /Cp 2 Fe) for the {FeNO} 7 /{FeNO} 8 reduction events (although irreversible reduction events) have previously been reported for mono- , and dinitrosyl , diiron complexes. Nearly reversible reduction events for five-coordinate ( E 1/2 = −1.34 V; −1.38 V; −1.48 to −1.60 V vs Cp 2 Fe + /Cp 2 Fe) and six-coordinate ( E 1/2 = −0.69 V; E pc = −1.03 V and −2.0 V; vs Cp 2 Fe + /Cp 2 Fe) {FeNO} 7 complexes have also been reported and these reduction events have been attributed to the reduction of the {FeNO} 7 units to the respective {FeNO} 8 units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[18] This indicates that the linear Fe-N-O angle in 1 originates from electronic factors,t hat is,avery covalent Fe-NO bond due to an electron-poor Fe center. [21] Angewandte Chemie Zuschriften stretch must have somehow shifted to significantly lower energy (< 1500 cm À1 ). TheU V/Vis spectroscopic titration of 1 with CoCp 2 shows acomplete transformation of 1 with one equivalent of reductant via appearance of an ew, highly intense band at 445 nm ( Figure S2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Crystal structure of complex 2 with thermal ellipsoids set at 50 %p robability.T he triflate counter anion, solvent molecules, and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity [21]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the reaction mixture by EPR and IR did not show conclusive evidence for the formation of dinitrosyl iron complex (DNIC) or Fe 2 (NO) 2 diamond core species (see Supporting Information). 44 It has been previously shown by Lehnert et al 24,25,45 and Meyer et al 33 that an electron-rich environment and a close N•••N distance are crucial for efficient N 2 O production. The electron-poor nature of the Py 4 DMcT ligand as well as the long N•••N distance in {FeNO} 7 2 (4.750 Å versus 2.803 Å in the case of Lehnert et al 24,25,45 ), likely hinders the formation of the N−N bond necessary for N 2 O production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%