1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02667560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fe-Y (iron-yttrium) system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Gschneider [3] thought that the experimental technique employed by Domagala et al [5] did not justify drawing the liquidus as a solid line, and Kubuschewski [4] made minor revisions to phase stoichiometries to bring the diagram into accord with the results from more recent crystallographic studies. The latest assessment was carried out by Zhang et al [6]. In this one [6] [7] neither Gschneidner nor Kubaschewski accepted the existence of an equilibrium phase at a stoichiometry of YFe 5 , that was reported by Farkas and Bauer [8] and by Nassau et al [9].…”
Section: Fe-y Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Gschneider [3] thought that the experimental technique employed by Domagala et al [5] did not justify drawing the liquidus as a solid line, and Kubuschewski [4] made minor revisions to phase stoichiometries to bring the diagram into accord with the results from more recent crystallographic studies. The latest assessment was carried out by Zhang et al [6]. In this one [6] [7] neither Gschneidner nor Kubaschewski accepted the existence of an equilibrium phase at a stoichiometry of YFe 5 , that was reported by Farkas and Bauer [8] and by Nassau et al [9].…”
Section: Fe-y Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest assessment was carried out by Zhang et al [6]. In this one [6] [7] neither Gschneidner nor Kubaschewski accepted the existence of an equilibrium phase at a stoichiometry of YFe 5 , that was reported by Farkas and Bauer [8] and by Nassau et al [9]. The reasons for rejection of that phase appear justified, and Taylor and Poldy [10] have been unable to find the phase.…”
Section: Fe-y Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,20] As the interface moves at these high speeds, thermodynamic equilibrium between liquid and solid phase compositions falters, and kinetic considerations dominate so that significant, elevated meta-stable concentrations of solute atoms can be ''trapped'' in solid solution. [18] In this study, the hypothesis is that the normally near zero room temperature solubility of Y in Fe [21] may be extended by melt spinning, and on subsequent heat treatment, the excess Y will precipitate and can simultaneously oxidize 'internally' to form a dispersion of Y-enriched oxides. Although melt spinning is also a batch process like MA, it is comparatively mature and has already been significantly scaled-up commercially and applied for the industrial production of amorphous ferromagnetic ribbons with a global capacity exceeding 100,000 t/ year.…”
Section: Ferritic Oxide Dispersion-strengthened (Ods)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fe-Y system has been reviewed by Gschneidner [88] and Zhang et al [89] and assessed by Du et al, [90] Konar, [41] Lu et al [91] and Kardellass et al [92] The crystal structures of the intermetallic phases considered in the present assessment are tabulated in Table 1. The optimized thermodynamic and magnetic parameters of the solid and Fig.…”
Section: The Fe-y (Iron-yttrium) Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen amount of alloys in pre and post experiment was minimal, as determined by inert gas fusion-infrared absorptiometry. The KEMS measurements were carried out for the samples across the entire composition in the temperature range of 1473-1573 K. The ion currents for Y were determined with the help of 89 Y isotope. The more abundant 54 Fe and 56 Fe were chosen for Fe detection among the possible 54 Fe, 56 Fe, 57 Fe and 58 Fe isotopes.…”
Section: The Fe-y (Iron-yttrium) Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%