1981
DOI: 10.1086/208866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Feasibility of Changing Electricity Consumption Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Household income is a dominant predictor for larger energy conservation investments (see Long, 1993;Kasulis et al, 1981;Poortinga et al, 2003;Walsh 1989). Education level is positively correlated with both energy use and energy conservation investments (Held 1983).…”
Section: Literature Review Incentives and Barriers Some Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Household income is a dominant predictor for larger energy conservation investments (see Long, 1993;Kasulis et al, 1981;Poortinga et al, 2003;Walsh 1989). Education level is positively correlated with both energy use and energy conservation investments (Held 1983).…”
Section: Literature Review Incentives and Barriers Some Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an econometric estimation of determinants of energy conservation expenditures Long (1993) proved that income level of the households was positively and statistically related to larger conservation investments. Kasulis et al (1981) had argued that if a household belonged to a low income group, they would be very likely to use low amounts of energy and they would not have the ability to respond to requests for greater conservation activity. Stern and Gardner (1981) stressed that energy efficiency is more preferable to higher income consumers rather than curtailment measures.…”
Section: Income Influences On Energy-conserving Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those few, some used an opt-in design eliciting a commitment to participate (hence confounded the mere-participation manipulation), had small samples, used weak manipulations, or omitted essential details in the research report, making it hard to tell what they did and found (20)(21)(22). As a measure of the importance of even small changes in energy consumption, states have set goals ranging from 0.1% to 2.25% annual savings (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%