2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04576-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feasibility of quantitative parameters of lymphoscintigraphy without significant dermal backflow for the evaluation of lymphedema in post-operative patients with breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences were found between groups divided by LS stages. 34,35 Yoon et al have reported that the higher the LS stage, the larger the volume of the affected limb before surgery. 17 Although we attempted to confirm this tendency in the BIA parameters, we found no significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant differences were found between groups divided by LS stages. 34,35 Yoon et al have reported that the higher the LS stage, the larger the volume of the affected limb before surgery. 17 Although we attempted to confirm this tendency in the BIA parameters, we found no significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aimed to determine the predictive value of lymphoscintigraphy in patients with LVA surgery due to extremity lymphedema. Lymphoscintigraphy is an objective and sensitive approach for diagnosing and evaluating lymphatic dysfunction and associated severity 14 . In addition to its diagnostic role, different roles for lymphoscintigraphy are being studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JN Yoo et al reported a significant correlation between quantitative lymphoscintigraphic factors and maximal circumferential difference in upper extremity lymphedema patients after breast cancer surgery [ 27 ]. Including the aforementioned study, several studies have used the ratio of quantitative indicators of edematous and non-edematous limbs [ 30 , 32 , 33 ]. Although this method is not available for bilateral lymphedema, it has the advantage of excellent reproducibility in several indicators [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%