2014
DOI: 10.3310/hta18030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feasibility of using a parenting programme for the prevention of unintentional home injuries in the under-fives: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included the practical guide by Ritzwoller et al 93 to costing behavioural interventions and methods used in other behavioural interventions such as the Diabetes Education and Self-Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed (DESMOND) programme, 94 A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST) 95 and the First-aid Advice and Safety Training (FAST) parent programme. 96 In keeping with both Hollingworth et al 95 and Mytton et al, 96 resources were categorised according to the stage at which they were used in the research process: planning and preparation for delivery (stage 1) or delivery itself (stage 2).…”
Section: Intervention Resource Use and Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These included the practical guide by Ritzwoller et al 93 to costing behavioural interventions and methods used in other behavioural interventions such as the Diabetes Education and Self-Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed (DESMOND) programme, 94 A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST) 95 and the First-aid Advice and Safety Training (FAST) parent programme. 96 In keeping with both Hollingworth et al 95 and Mytton et al, 96 resources were categorised according to the stage at which they were used in the research process: planning and preparation for delivery (stage 1) or delivery itself (stage 2).…”
Section: Intervention Resource Use and Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…density of alcohol outlets, opening hours and local marketing), and actions such as industry-driven corporate social responsibility initiatives, marketing and packaging regulations and community-based initiatives may complement or disrupt school-based actions. [93][94][95][96][97] There is also increasing interest in schools as environments for health promotion through actions that modify the physical and social environment. 98 Interventions and curricula, such as STAMPP, are therefore not being delivered in isolation, and, although study design characteristics such as randomisation control for internal biases, there is a need to better understand how interventions complement each other, the dynamic interplay between intervention components at different levels (e.g.…”
Section: Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included the practical guide to costing behavioural interventions of Ritzwoller et al 132 and methods used in other behavioural interventions such as the Diabetes Education and Self-Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed (DESMOND) programme, 133 A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST) 134 and the First-aid Advice and Safety Training (FAST) parent programme. 135 In keeping with both ASSIST and FAST trials, costs were categorised according to the stage at which they were incurred in the research process: planning and preparation for delivery (stage 1) and delivery itself (stage 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivering universal services, these practitioners have very high potential reach [25] and are well placed to approach pregnant women, new parents and families about participation in research. However, where health visitors and community midwives have been involved in participant recruitment, disappointing recruitment and limited representativeness of the study sample has been a concern [26][27][28][29]. There is very little previous research exploring the experiences of these community health professionals in research, with only one study looking at barriers to community midwives identifying potential participants in a speci c randomised controlled trial (RCT) [35] and none that we have found looking at the experiences of health visitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%