2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Feasibility of Whole-Liver Drainage with a Novel 8 mm Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent Possessing an Ultra-Slim Introducer for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstructions

Abstract: Background: In the case of an unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO), the optimal drainage method has not yet been established. Recently, an 8 mm, fully covered, self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) with an ultra-slim introducer has become available. In this article, the results of whole-liver drainage tests using this novel FCSEMS for MHBO are reported. Methods: Unresectable MHBOs up to Bismuth IIIa with strictures limited to the secondary branches were eligible. The proximal end of the stent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With recent developments in chemotherapy and prolonging survival of patients with MHBO (for example with CCA) stenting with UCSEMS is becoming a suboptimal strategy due to tumor overgrowth by the wire mesh of UCSEMS and the inability to replace the stent (Table 2.). To date, there have been only five studies published evaluating the use of FCSEMS in MHBO (Inoue et al [33], Yoshida et al [38], Kitamura et al [39], Takahashi et al [40], Matsubara et al [41]). Each one has shown high technical and clinical success rates and the high success rate of endoscopic re-intervention.…”
Section: Stent Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With recent developments in chemotherapy and prolonging survival of patients with MHBO (for example with CCA) stenting with UCSEMS is becoming a suboptimal strategy due to tumor overgrowth by the wire mesh of UCSEMS and the inability to replace the stent (Table 2.). To date, there have been only five studies published evaluating the use of FCSEMS in MHBO (Inoue et al [33], Yoshida et al [38], Kitamura et al [39], Takahashi et al [40], Matsubara et al [41]). Each one has shown high technical and clinical success rates and the high success rate of endoscopic re-intervention.…”
Section: Stent Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent advances in chemotherapy have prolonged survival and increased the chance of stent occlusion, and unremovable UCSEMS have become a problematic barrier to reintervention. A fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) can be removed and is expected to have a good patency period due to its larger diameter compared to a plastic stent [ 8 ], but there is still little evidence, so future large-scale clinical trials are needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%