2007
DOI: 10.1080/17439880701511073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
67
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers use IWB technology maintaining learner's attention labeling, highlighting and coloring features of the content in a continued high level of participatory pedagogy [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers use IWB technology maintaining learner's attention labeling, highlighting and coloring features of the content in a continued high level of participatory pedagogy [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of IWB activities during math and English lessons (Kennewell & Beauchamp, 2007) showed activities that are more effective with IBW compared to black/whiteboard and functions that are possible only with IWB (e.g., results of math questions saved for review on the next lesson). In some advanced cases, especially when student-IWB interactivity is involved, this tech-nology is used as a 'mindtool' (Jonassen, 2006) extending students' cognition and supporting the thinking process.…”
Section: Iwb As a Mindtoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases the use of the IWB appeared to be simply replacing the blackboard. The literature expressed concern about 'misuse' of IWB by teachers by over-using functions that simply mimic chalkboard techniques, primarily writing, with a lowlevel of student engagement (Kennewell & Beauchamp, 2007;Way et al, 2009). …”
Section: Iwb As a Mindtoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dünyada Avusturalya (Holmes, 2009) (Çelik ve Atak, 2012). Alanyazın incelendiğinde etkileşimli tahtaların öğrenme (Slay vd.,2008;Serow & Callingham, 2008;Kennewell & Beauchamp, 2007) ve öğretme (Verenikina,Wrona, Jones, & Kervin, 2010;Holmes, 2009) üzerindeki etkilerinin incelendiği, bu teknolojinin kullanılması sırasında karşılaşılan sorunların tartışıldığı (Türel, 2012;Somyürek, Atasoy ve Özdemir, 2009), öğrencilerin veya öğretmenlerin bu teknolojiye karşı tutumlarının ve görüşlerinin belirlendiği (Çelik ve Atak, 2012;Türel & Johnson, 2012;Sünkür, Şanlı ve Arabacı, 2011;Baydaş, Esgice, Kalafat ve Göktaş, 2011;Ateş, 2010;Beeland, 2002;Lai, 2010;Hall & Higgins, 2005) çeşitli araştırmalara rastlanmaktadır. Öte yandan, matematik ve geometri derslerinin soyut kavramları içerdiği, görselleştirme ve somutlaştırma yapabilmenin her ortamda mümkün olmadığı bilinmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified