2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2210049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Federal Circuit's New Obviousness Jurisprudence: An Empirical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most important Supreme Court decisions, not only for purposes of substantive patent law, but also for purposes of institutional interaction, was KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. According to Rantanen (2013), in the 10 years prior to the grant of certiorari in KSR, the Federal Circuit found 54% of patent claims on appeal nonobvious. Since then, it has found 43% nonobvious.…”
Section: B the Supreme Court And Executive Branch Strike Backmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important Supreme Court decisions, not only for purposes of substantive patent law, but also for purposes of institutional interaction, was KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. According to Rantanen (2013), in the 10 years prior to the grant of certiorari in KSR, the Federal Circuit found 54% of patent claims on appeal nonobvious. Since then, it has found 43% nonobvious.…”
Section: B the Supreme Court And Executive Branch Strike Backmentioning
confidence: 99%