Failed Promises 2015
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028837.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Federal Government’s Response to Environmental Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence is not uniform, and there remain important, unresolved debates about the causal mechanism(s) underlying these patterns [31][32][33]. Nevertheless, the presence of these disparities has generated social mobilization among affected communities [34,35], and at least some limited response from federal, state, and local government agencies [33,[36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence is not uniform, and there remain important, unresolved debates about the causal mechanism(s) underlying these patterns [31][32][33]. Nevertheless, the presence of these disparities has generated social mobilization among affected communities [34,35], and at least some limited response from federal, state, and local government agencies [33,[36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Obama Administration devoted considerable resources to dealing with environmental inequity, specifically creating a new interagency working group, whose participants all signed a memorandum of understanding, devoted to accomplishing the goals of EO 12898 (Kaswan 2013;Konisky 2015;Salcido 2016). This group was part of the larger programme "Plan EJ 2014" which signified a renewed effort to emphasise the importance of EJ in EPA activities.…”
Section: The Origins and State Of Ejmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bush Administration sought to downplay the significance of race and ethnicity in agency rulemaking (O’Neil 2007; Salcido 2016), a development which caused the US Office of Inspector General (2004) and the GAO (2005) to rebuke the EPA for its failure to consider equity in its rulemaking. The Obama Administration devoted considerable resources to dealing with environmental inequity, specifically creating a new interagency working group, whose participants all signed a memorandum of understanding, devoted to accomplishing the goals of EO 12898 (Kaswan 2013; Konisky 2015; Salcido 2016). This group was part of the larger programme “Plan EJ 2014” which signified a renewed effort to emphasise the importance of EJ in EPA activities.…”
Section: The Origins and State Of Ejmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluations of the EPA and its actions in light of EO 12898 have found its implementation slow, inconsistent, and often nonexistent (NACA, 2001; EPA, 2004). These shortcomings are why scholars insist that the executive order was largely a symbolic political gesture (Cooper, 2001; Konisky, 2015).…”
Section: Environmental Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%