1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1972.tb01734.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feeding mechanism of sharks of the family Carcharhinidae

Abstract: The morphology of thefeedingapparatus in several genera of carcharhinid sharks (Carcharhinus, Rhizoprionodon, Hypoprion, Prionace, Galeocerdo and Negaprion) was studied in both fresh and preserved states. The actions of the cranial musculature were determined through electrical stimulation. The feeding behaviours of representatives of the genera Carcharhinus, Negaprion and Galeocerdo were studied under controlled conditions by direct observation as well as photographically. The cranial anatomy of carcharhinid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a single sheet of muscle in Lamniformes, agreeing with Luther (), Compagno (), Shirai (), Huber et al (), and Wilga (). In contrast with Moss (), Compagno (), Motta et al (), Wilga and Motta (), Wilga (), and Nakaya et al (), that used the term “m. levator palatoquadrati” to this single muscle, the term “m.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed a single sheet of muscle in Lamniformes, agreeing with Luther (), Compagno (), Shirai (), Huber et al (), and Wilga (). In contrast with Moss (), Compagno (), Motta et al (), Wilga and Motta (), Wilga (), and Nakaya et al (), that used the term “m. levator palatoquadrati” to this single muscle, the term “m.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other variations in mandibular and hyoidean muscles have been discussed as putative characters to clarify relationships at less inclusive levels, such as within Orectolobiformes (Shirai, 1996;Goto, 2001) and Carcharhiniformes (Nakaya, 1975;Compagno, 1988). Mandibular and hyoid arch muscles of galeomorphs were also described in studies focusing on patterns of the trigeminal nerve (Luther, 1909a;Casas et al, 2005), in descriptive and comparative anatomical works (Daniel, 1934;Edgeworth, 1935;Denison, 1937;Kesteven, 1943), and in papers on functional morphology (Moss, 1972(Moss, , 1977(Moss, , 1981Lima et al, 1997;Motta et al, 1997Motta et al, , 2002Motta and Wilga, 1999;Wilga and Motta, 2000;Huber et al, 2005;Wilga, 2005;Nakaya et al, 2008). As a consequence, there is much descriptive information in the literature that may aid new myological comparisons or even provide useful phylogenetic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elasmobranchs are less well studied in this regard. Some carcharhinids have shown the ability to modulate feeding behavior based on prey type, size or presentation (Moss, ; Tricas and McCosker, ; Frazzetta and Prange, ; Motta et al, ), though most specialized suction feeding sharks displayed less modulatory ability (Ferry‐Graham, 1997, 1998; Edmonds et al, ; Motta et al, ; Matott et al, ). Indeed, some of the few feeding kinematic studies on batoids illustrate modulation in feeding behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this conservatism, most of these fishes are capable of modulating the kinematics of the feeding behaviour in response to prey type, prey size or stage (strike, process, transport, swallow) (Moss, 1972;Liem, 1978;Lauder, 1981;Frazzetta and Prange, 1987;Motta et al, 1997;Nemeth, 1997a;Nemeth, 1997b;Ferry-Graham, 1998;Wilga and Motta, 1998a;Wilga and Motta, 1998b;Friel and Wainwright, 1998;Pretlow-Edmonds, 1999;Ferry-Graham et al, 2001). In particular, suction strikes are typically shorter in duration than bite strikes, and suction transports are shorter than suction strikes (Gillis and Lauder, 1995;Wilga and Motta, 1998a;Wilga and Motta, 1998b;Motta et al, 1997;Westneat, 2006;Motta, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%