2014
DOI: 10.1044/2014_jslhr-l-13-0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Filtered Words Test and the Influence of Lexicality

Abstract: The linguistic content of real-word stimuli benefits performance on low-pass filtered speech tests at filter levels above 1500 Hz. Caution must be taken when using real-word stimuli in low-pass filtered speech tests as part of an auditory processing diagnostic test battery, because language ability will impact on performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting that different abilities of auditory comprehension seem to mature at a similar speed, which could be due to shared neural substrates. 12,26,27,39,40 Importantly, these results demonstrate that age-related adjustments in normal performance standards for clinical practices can be done across tests for each age range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting that different abilities of auditory comprehension seem to mature at a similar speed, which could be due to shared neural substrates. 12,26,27,39,40 Importantly, these results demonstrate that age-related adjustments in normal performance standards for clinical practices can be done across tests for each age range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…They force the central nervous system to reconstruct a verbal message by reducing information redundancy in speech signals using filtering. 1,4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] FSTs assess auditory closure (AC), 1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] which is the ability to reconstruct an acoustic message when part of its frequency range is removed; the BRT 1,9,18 evaluates the ability to synthesize partial, simultaneous, and complementary information presented for both ears.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W testach wykorzystywane są zarówno słowa sensowne, jak i nonsensowne. W jednym z ostatnich badań [34] sprawdzano wpływ rodzaju bodźców językowych na wykonanie testu filtracji mowy. Prezentowano 80 jednosylabowych słów sensownych i 80 nonsensownych, które nie różniły się pod względem parametrów filtracji.…”
Section: Mowa Filtrowanaunclassified
“…The slightly higher failure rate on DD than on LPFS testing (24.6% and 19%, respectively) in children with LD suggests these children experienced greater difficulties in the skills assessed by DD than those assessed by LPFS. The exact nature of these skills remains a topic of debate, with DD thought to assess dichotic listening as well as attention and short-term memory (Hugdahl, 2000;Lawfield, McFarland, & Cacace, 2011;Moncrieff, 2006;Musiek, 1983;Parkinson, 1974) and LPFS thought to assess monaural low redundancy and auditory closure while being influenced by the person's lexicon (Arnott, Goli, Bradley, Smith, & Wilson, 2014;Bellis, 2003;Bellis & Ferre, 1999;Weihing et al, 2015). While these greater failure rates show that children with LD experienced greater difficulties with these two auditory processing skills, caution is needed before suggesting this represents a greater prevalence rate of auditory processing disorder, as diagnosis of auditory processing disorder typically requires a more comprehensive assessment than the two tests of AP used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%