The Final Chapter in the Nursing Administration Research Priorities Saga The State of the State

Lynn, Mary R.; Layman, Eve L.; Richard, Susan

doi:10.1097/00005110-199905000-00002

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several national studies have been focused on specialist nursing practice areas including critical care (Lewandowski & Kositsky, 1983; Lindquist et al, 1993; Lopez, 2003), care of children (Hinds et al, 1994), emergency nursing (Bayley, MacLean, Desy, McMahon, & Broomall, 2004), and mental health nursing (Hardy et al, 2004). In addition, some studies have been focused on priorities for nursing administration (Henry et al, 1987; Lynn, Layman, & Richard, 1999) and education (Bullock & Grayson, 1995). Eight studies of national nursing research priorities have been identified; two in the US (Lindeman, 1975; Hinshaw, Heinrich, & Bloch, 1988), two in the UK (Kitson, McMahon, Rafferty, & Scott, 1997; Ross, Smith, Mackenzie, & Masterson, 2004), and one each in Taiwan (Yin et al, 1999), Spain (Moreno‐Casbas, Martin‐Arribas, Orts‐Cortes, & Comet‐Cortes, 2001), Hong Kong (French, Ho, & Lee, 2002), and Korea (Kim, Oh, Kim, Yoo, & Ko, 2002).…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Nursing Research Priorities for Ireland

Drennan¹,

Meehan²,

Kemple³

et al. 2007

J of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

These research priorities identified for nursing in Ireland indicate, to an extent, the nursing research priorities identified in other European countries and in North America. The research priorities identified in this survey indicate that outcomes of care and the need to make nursing visible are attaining a higher priority than seen in previous studies. Also evident is that nursing shortages and increasing skill-mix in the clinical area have indicated a need for research into nurse recruitment, staff turnover, and staffing levels and how these issues affect patient outcomes. The priorities suggest research programmes that target the health service concerns identified in the national health agenda, such as the need to identify protocols and procedures that improve patient and client care outcomes and to examine and test solutions to workforce problems.

show abstract

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Nursing Research Priorities for Ireland

Drennan¹,

Meehan²,

Kemple³

et al. 2007

J of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…14 The study was funded by the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and directed by Drs Mary Lynn and Sheila Englebardt. 14 At that time, nursing administration research was viewed as unfocused and more like stomping out fires emanating from shifting practice concerns rather than generating and building a scientific base for administrative practice. 15 The interest in establishing research priorities has continued.…”

Section: Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Looking Backmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 1996, as an outcome of the fifth NARC, the CGEAN endorsed a national Delphi study13 to focus the conduct and funding of nursing administration research on high-priority topics 14. The study was funded by the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and directed by Drs Mary Lynn and Sheila Englebardt 14. At that time, nursing administration research was viewed as unfocused and more like stomping out fires emanating from shifting practice concerns rather than generating and building a scientific base for administrative practice 15…”

Section: Looking Backmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Looking Back to Move Forward

Jennings¹

2021

Nursing Administration Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is based on an invited presentation delivered in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Association of Leadership Science in Nursing. The article begins with framing the historical context of nursing administration/leadership. The look-back includes a glimpse at the evolution of the Council on Graduate Education for Administrative Nursing into the Association of Leadership Science in Nursing. Two present-day leadership issues are then considered—turbulence and interprofessional proficiency. Lastly, the concept of problematizing is proposed as a strategy for moving forward. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow though are not tidy packages with good boundaries. The chronology, therefore, is not always linear.

show abstract

“…Nursing organizations in other countries have followed ONS's lead and used similar approaches (Bakker & Fitch, 1998;Goldfrad, Vella, Bion, Rowan, & Black, 2000;Hinshaw, 1997;Moreno-Casbas, Martin-Arribas, Orts-Cortes, & Comet-Cortes, 2001; Rustoen & Schjolberg, 2000). Research priorities also have been established for other specialty areas of nursing, such as critical care and nursing administration (Lindquist et al, 1993;Lynn, Layman, & Englebardt, 1998;Lynn, Layman, & Richard, 1999;Rudy, 1996;Sedlak, Ross, Arslanian, & Taggart, 1998;Wipke-Tevis, 2001).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%