The Final Ends of Higher Education in Light of an African Moral Theory

Abstract

From the perspective of an African ethic, analytically interpreted as a philosophical principle of right action, what are the proper final ends of a publicly funded university and how should they be ranked? To answer this question, I first provide a brief but inclusive review of the literature on Africanising higher education from the past 50 years, and contend that the prominent final ends suggested in it can be reduced to five major categories. Then, I spell out an intuitively attractive African moral theory and apply it to these five final ends, arguing that three of them are appropriate but that two of them are not. After that, I maintain that the African moral theory prescribes two additional final ends for a public university that are not salient in the literature. Next, I argue that employing the African moral theory as I do enables one to rebut several criticisms of Africanising higher education that have recently been made from a liberal perspective. I conclude by posing questions suitable for future research.

Higher Education, Knowledge for Its Own Sake, and an African Moral Theory

“…To think otherwise is to neglect the tricky, but definitive, role that institutional factors can play in moral choice. 7 The next several paragraphs borrow from Metz (2009aMetz ( , pp. 182-184, 2009b.…”

Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review

“…In light of the preceding paragraphs, the common view in the literature is that fellowship, interconnectedness, interdependence, reconciliation, relationality, community, friendliness, harmonious relationships and other-regarding actions have special significance in evaluating the morality of an action. [2,4,13,14,19,21,23,25,43,56,57,67,71,78,84,90,94,104,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112] If the self were to be the basis for right action, then the self could justify any action as long as it benefits the self. On this relational account of morality, an other-regarding view fundamentally determines the way the self should behave.…”

Philosophy of Education: Becoming Less Western, More African?

“…Communities are not only inclined to marginalise some of their members from within, as has been the experience of gays in some parts of Africa and the West. If right acts are those that value harmony and respect relationships of identity and solidarity (Metz, , p. 191; see also Metz, , where he lays the groundwork for an African moral theory), what are the implications for those not of the community? If an educated person has acquired a communitarian sense of responsibility toward kin and community, the virtues of ‘mutual respect, sincerity, justice and moral sensitivity’ rightly prized by Waghid amount to too little if thus confined.…”