“…Before we present our account of the Scope Generalization, we need to clarify three basic assumptions. First, we follow the bulk of the literature on negation in assuming that clauses contain (at least) two scopal positions dedicated to negation (see, among others, Lasnik , Robbers , Zanuttini , Oosthuizen , Van Kemenade , Barbiers , Cormack & Smith , Haegeman , Holmberg , Schwarz & Bhatt , Biberauer , Tubau , Van Craenenbroeck ). More specifically, the clause structure we adopt is the one in (57), with two Pol(arity)Ps, one dominating and one dominated by TP…”