2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2010.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The financing of the IASB: An analysis of donor diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution pattern remains erratic as a considerable number of jurisdictions have so far contributed nothing at all. Larson and Kenny (2011) conclude that the pattern of funding provides no evidence of undue influence by any party or region, a conclusion with which we concur. Yet the relationship between funding and influence and, by implication, legitimacy, remains complex.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Setting Standards For a Worldwide Constituesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The contribution pattern remains erratic as a considerable number of jurisdictions have so far contributed nothing at all. Larson and Kenny (2011) conclude that the pattern of funding provides no evidence of undue influence by any party or region, a conclusion with which we concur. Yet the relationship between funding and influence and, by implication, legitimacy, remains complex.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Setting Standards For a Worldwide Constituesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…More recently, the process of lobbying on accounting regulation has been studied from the perspective of institutional theory (Bengtsson, 2011;Chatham, Larson and Vietze, 2010;Fogarty, 1992;Giner and Arce, 2012;Kenny and Larson, 1993;Koh, 2011;Larson 2002Larson , 2008Larson and Kenny, 2011). This theory suggests that the actions of organizations should be understood as attempts to obtain legitimacy and to maintain credibility with external constituents (Fogarty, 1992).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the standard-setting process is a political one, organizations such as the IASB must continuously monitor the needs of their constituents and adjust their operations to accommodate those needs (Kenny and Larson, 1993;Larson and Kenny, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The political nature of accounting standard setting in Western nations, particularly the development of IASB standards, has been well recognised in the accounting literature (Bengtsson, 2011;Brown, 2004Brown, , 2006Georgiou, 2010;Larson and Kenny, 2011;Maines et al, 2004;McLeay et al, 2000). It is argued that the development of accounting standards has been captured by influential industrial interests through strong lobbying efforts during the standard setting process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%