Integration of our own morphological obser- Each component of the carotid bbdy parenchyma has been assumed to be the chemoreceptive one: glomus (type I) cells (1, 3-6), sustentacular (type II) cells (7,8), "free" nerve endings (9), and nerve endings terminating on the type I cells (10, 11). Furthermore, in addition to having a chemoreceptive function, the glomus cells have been considered to be secretory or effector cells (9,(12)(13)(14), interneurons (10, 11), or a combination of these.Perhaps the most generally accepted theory was that glomus cells respond to hypoxia by releasing a neurotransmitter that initiates an increase of firing rate of the nerve fibers terminating on the glomus cells (15). The afferent nature of these fibers was deduced by De Castro (16) from light-microscopic examinations. However, the early ultrastructural studies failed to show evidence of afferent synapses with the glomus cells. On the contrary, these nerve endings were thought to be presynaptic to glomus cells and therefore efferent in function, because they contain large numbers of clear vesicles (17-21). These electron microscopic results were further substantiated by Biscoe et al. (13,22), who reported that nerve endings on glomus cells degenerate after the glossopharyngeal nerve is cut central to the petrosal ganglion. From these results, they concluded that the nerve endings belonged not to afferent axons whose cell bodies were in the petrosal ganglion, but to efferent axons whose cell bodies were in the brain stem. They concluded also that chemoreceptive nerves ended not on glomus cells but elsewhere in the carotid body. These findings and conclusions led to an alternative theory of chemoreceptor function (9)