2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-013-9432-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Finite Rank Theorem for Toeplitz Operators on the Fock Space

Abstract: We consider Toeplitz operators on the Fock space, under rather general conditions imposed on the symbols. It is proved that if the operator has finite rank then the operator and the symbol should be zero. The method of proof is different from the ones used previously for finite rank theorems, and it enables us to get rid of the compact support condition and even allow a certain growth of the symbol. LATP,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can find a detailed historical overview in [4,12,14]. In particular, in [4] a finite rank theorem has been proved for operators in the Fock space of analytical functions on C 1 square integrable with weight function ω(z) = π −1 e −|z| 2 having symbols-functions subject to rather mild, almost sharp, growth restrictions. However, the reasoning in [4] does not apply to symbols-distributions.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can find a detailed historical overview in [4,12,14]. In particular, in [4] a finite rank theorem has been proved for operators in the Fock space of analytical functions on C 1 square integrable with weight function ω(z) = π −1 e −|z| 2 having symbols-functions subject to rather mild, almost sharp, growth restrictions. However, the reasoning in [4] does not apply to symbols-distributions.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in [4] a finite rank theorem has been proved for operators in the Fock space of analytical functions on C 1 square integrable with weight function ω(z) = π −1 e −|z| 2 having symbols-functions subject to rather mild, almost sharp, growth restrictions. However, the reasoning in [4] does not apply to symbols-distributions. The only presently known approach to deal with this latter case, developed for compactly supported symbols in [1], is based upon the result on the solvability of the∂-equation, namely on Lemma 1.2.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%