The first 10 years of the Trojan Horse defence

Bowles, Stephen V.; Hernández-Castro, Julio

doi:10.1016/s1361-3723(15)70005-9

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, a small historical lesson may also be drawn. The first Trojan Horse Defence (THD) [34,35] was successful at least in part because its low plausibility was not appreciated with any degree of certainty at the time of the trial; however, subsequent quantitative analysis based on complexity theory was able to attach probabilities to each of a number of different THD scenarios [36]. The putative Inadvertent Download Defence (IDD) against the possession of small quantities of child pornography has also been analysed quantitatively using statistical Urn methods to determine its plausibility with numerical data from two actual cases that ultimately did not go to trial [37].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cosmic rays

Overill

2020

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cosmic rays

Overill

2020

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…of child pornography) amongst a much larger number of non-illicit material (e.g. of adult pornography) it is possible to use an Urn Model [ 28 , 29 ] and the Binomial Theorem to calculate the probability of the inadvertent download defence, under the assumption of random browsing activity. In two actual cases from Hong Kong, China the 95% confidence interval for the plausibility of this defence was shown to be ca.…”

Section: Proposition Plausibility Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative evaluation of the results of digital forensic investigations: a review of progress

Overill

Collie

2021

Forensic Sciences Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unlike conventional forensics, digital forensics does not at present generally quantify the results of its investigations. It is suggested that digital forensics should aim to catch-up with other forensic disciplines by using Bayesian and other numerical methodologies to quantify its investigations' results. Assessing the plausibility of alternative hypotheses (or propositions, or claims) which explain how recovered digital evidence came to exist on a device could assist both the prosecution and the defence sides in criminal proceedings: helping the prosecution to decide whether to proceed to trial and helping defence lawyers to advise a defendant how to plead. This paper reviews some numerical approaches to the goal of quantifying the relative weights of individual items of digital evidence and the plausibility of hypotheses based on that evidence. The potential advantages enabling the construction of cost-effective digital forensic triage schemas are also outlined. KEY POINTS The absence of quantified results from digital forensic investigations, unlike those of conventional forensics, is highlighted. A number of approaches towards quantitative evaluation of the results of digital forensic investigations are reviewed. The significant potential benefits accruing from such approaches are discussed.

show abstract

“…[1] Hackers often use it with Backdoor, connecting computers between the hacker and the victim, to steal someone's account and password or Confidential information or both. A Trojan also can be used in controlling the victim's computer to attack other computer.…”

Section: A Definition Of the Trojanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Connect the Virtual to a Real World The Issue of Trojan Defense

Chang¹

2016

Fourth International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Management and Human Behaviour - SMHB 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-this paper discusses the Trojan defense, a common question on who really did it. In order to prove who did this post on SNS means we want to connect a specific internet character with a real person in the world. Actually, the present technology only can prove the issued post done by a specific IP address. Prosecutors need circumstance evidences to support their claims and connect to the defendant. Thus, this paper first will explain the background of the Trojan defense, such as the definition, characteristics and functions of the Trojan. Then it discusses how to handle the Trojan defense in technical and legal approaches, and concludes how the legal system represents or actually constructs the past fact.

show abstract

The first 10 years of the Trojan Horse defence

Cited by 7 publications

References 4 publications

Cosmic rays

Cosmic rays

Quantitative evaluation of the results of digital forensic investigations: a review of progress

Connect the Virtual to a Real World The Issue of Trojan Defense

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About