2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first cohort of prospective Fontan surgical planning patients with follow-up data: How accurate is surgical planning?

Abstract: Objective: Fontan surgical planning is an image-based, collaborative effort which is hypothesized to result in improved patient outcomes. A common motivation for Fontan surgical planning is the progression (or concern for progression) of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of surgical planning predictions, specifically hepatic flow distribution (HFD, a known factor in PAVM progression), and identify methodological improvements needed to increase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, FSI has little impact on time-averaged quantities (pressure drop, power loss, HFD) under resting breath-held condition. Considering time-averaged hemodynamic quantities are the more common surrogates of patients' hemodynamic performance for surgical planning of TCPC, the results here support the notion that a rigid wall assumption is a reasonable assumption for such image-based surgical planning systems [29,[53][54][55][56]. The framework for a surgical planning system of TCPC already exists [57,58] to prospectively model different surgical configurations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, FSI has little impact on time-averaged quantities (pressure drop, power loss, HFD) under resting breath-held condition. Considering time-averaged hemodynamic quantities are the more common surrogates of patients' hemodynamic performance for surgical planning of TCPC, the results here support the notion that a rigid wall assumption is a reasonable assumption for such image-based surgical planning systems [29,[53][54][55][56]. The framework for a surgical planning system of TCPC already exists [57,58] to prospectively model different surgical configurations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, the differences in time-averaged pressure drops (0.01 mmHg) and power losses (0.1 mW) between the two simulations were small. Hepatic flow distribution was also quantified, which is a TCPC hemodynamic metric that was related to the risk of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations [11,12,53]. As shown in Figure 15, the instantaneous HFD varies within the simulated cycle between the rigid wall and FSI simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realistic use of preoperative Fontan planning requires development of a tool that is quick, easy to use, requires standard clinical data for its inputs, and can turnaround accurate recommendations quickly and clearly to ensure accurate implantation of Fontan designs. Prior research demonstrated discrepancies between the pre-operative and post-operative results (6), however, it is difficult to separately quantify the relative contribution of errors in CFD prediction, surgical implantation, and vessel structure alternation to the difference between predicted and observed hemodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complications are linked to hemodynamics in post-operative Fontan geometries (3). The correlation between the development of PAVM and hepatic flow distribution (HFD) (4)(5)(6) and the negative correlation between decreased exercise capacity and power loss in Fontan (7) have been demonstrated by various groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a well-established technique that has been widely used to study hemodynamics of cardiovascular diseases ( Taylor and Figueroa, 2009 ), and can be used to assess the hemodynamic effect of planned surgical interventions ( Bove et al, 2003 ; Sundareswaran et al, 2009 ; de Zélicourt et al, 2011 ; Restrepo et al, 2015 ; van Bakel T. M. J. et al, 2018 ; Trusty et al, 2019 ; Toma et al, 2020 ; Tossas-Betancourt et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ; Primeaux et al, 2021 ). In this work, we evaluated the feasibility of an endovascular repair considered by the pediatric cardiology team at the University of Michigan C.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%