2011
DOI: 10.1134/s0012496611020074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first Haramiyid (Mammalia, Allotheria) from the Jurassic of Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mandibular features labeled in that figure (figure 2 in ref. 1) were questioned by Averianov et al (17). Bi and colleagues (18) further argued that "Logically, a mandibular middle ear cannot be assumed in Haramiyavia" (supporting information p. 19 in ref.…”
Section: Mandibular Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mandibular features labeled in that figure (figure 2 in ref. 1) were questioned by Averianov et al (17). Bi and colleagues (18) further argued that "Logically, a mandibular middle ear cannot be assumed in Haramiyavia" (supporting information p. 19 in ref.…”
Section: Mandibular Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conflicting placement of haramiyidans was attributable in part to the uncertainties in interpreting the isolated teeth of most Late Triassic haramiyids (21,22). More recent phylogenetic disagreements have resulted from different interpretations of mandibular characters in Haramiyavia (17)(18)(19)(20)(23)(24)(25), which has not been fully described ( figure 2 in ref. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haramiyida and Multituberculata were considered as two orders in Allotheria in the classification of Kielan-Jaworowska et al (2004). However, a common view is that, if multituberculates and haramiyidans form the clade Allotheria, multituberculates would form a monophyletic group that was derived from "haramiyidans" within Allotheria; thus, "haramiyidans" form a paraphyletic group (Butler, 2000;Butler and Hooker, 2005;Hahn and Hahn, 2006;Averianov and Lopatin, 2011). Given this view and the phylogenetic relationship we prefered Krause et al, 2014), we regard the traditional "haramiyidans" as a paraphyletic group and place the name between quotation marks in the text.…”
Section: Taxonomic Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Euharamiyidans are advanced members of "haramiyidans" that were often placed in Allotheria, along with Multituberculata and probably Gondwanatheria, but their taxonomic position within Mammaliaformes is highly contentious (Simpson, 1929(Simpson, , 1947Hahn, 1973;Sigogneau-Russell et al, 1986;Hahn et al, 1989;Butler and MacIntyre, 1994;Jenkins et al, 1997;McKenna and Bell, 1997;Kermack et al, 1998;Butler, 2000;Kielan-Jaworowska et al, 2004;Hahn and Hahn, 2006), and the controversial interpretations of "haramiyidan" relationships are reflected in numerous phylogenetic studies (Lombard and Bolt, 1979;Luo et al, 2002;Rowe et al, 2008;Gurovich and Beck, 2009;Liu and Olsen, 2010;Averianov and Lopatin, 2011). The phylogeny of "haramiyidans" has remained enigmatic partly because most species of the group have been known from isolated teeth (Sigogneau-Russell, 1989;Butler and MacIntyre, 1994;Kermack et al, 1998;Heinrich, 1999;Butler, 2000;Heinrich, 2001;Butler and Hooker, 2005;Maisch et al, 2005;Hahn and Hahn, 2006;Martin et al, 2010;Averianov et al, 2011). Haramiyavia clemmenseni (Jenkins et al, 1997;Luo et al, 2015) is based on fragmentary jaws with relatively well-preserved dentition and some postcranial remains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%