2015
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The First Introduction of Graphene to Rechargeable Li–CO2 Batteries

Abstract: The utilization of the greenhouse gas CO2 in energy-storage systems is highly desirable. It is now shown that the introduction of graphene as a cathode material significantly improves the performance of Li-CO2 batteries. Such batteries display a superior discharge capacity and enhanced cycle stability. Therefore, graphene can act as an efficient cathode in Li-CO2 batteries, and it provides a novel approach for simultaneously capturing CO2 and storing energy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
284
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
284
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[47] To confirm the presence of carbon, both Li and co-workers and Zhou and co-workers studied the rechargeable Li-CO 2 batteries using a porous gold [47] and a platinum net cathode, [48] respectively. They detected the formation of amorphous carbon and the reversible formation and decomposition of Li 2 CO 3 , consistent with Reaction 9.…”
Section: Li-co 2 Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[47] To confirm the presence of carbon, both Li and co-workers and Zhou and co-workers studied the rechargeable Li-CO 2 batteries using a porous gold [47] and a platinum net cathode, [48] respectively. They detected the formation of amorphous carbon and the reversible formation and decomposition of Li 2 CO 3 , consistent with Reaction 9.…”
Section: Li-co 2 Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[52][53][54] Zhang et al first introduced graphene into rechargeable Li-CO 2 batteries, showing a higher discharge capacity of 14774 mAh g −1 as compared with that of the electrodes with KB and Super P (Figure 5a,b). [48] The authors proposed that the graphene with its porous structure and excellent electrochemical activity provides efficient diffusion channels, and enough space and active sites for CO 2 utilization and capture. Nevertheless, the kinetic parameters of Li-CO 2 batteries with graphene cathodes still need to be further improved to reach higher efficiency.…”
Section: Wwwadvsustainsyscommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various kinds of carbon materials with unique morphology and porous structure have been tested, such as carbon powder, nanotubes, and graphene. 20 In addition to the morphology and structure, the surface modifications (e.g. N-doped) of carbon materials have been shown great effects on the battery performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the safety of Li-O 2 battery can be improved without sacrificing the electrochemical performance. Additionally, during the charge process, three voltage plateaus are 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 14 displayed, at low potentials (at about 3.6 V) this may involves the decay of amorphous Li 2 O 2 , whereas at higher potentials (at 4.0-4.2 V), crystalline Li 2 O 2 may is decomposed via a Li deficient solid solution reaction, and the decomposition reaction of Li 2 CO 3 -like species may occur at 4.2-4.5 V. [33][34][35] Whereas, the obvious difference from cycling stability of the cells using GPE and liquid electrolyte at the current density of 200 mA g -1 is displayed in Figure 5a and b, in which more than 50 cycles is achieved using GPE, while only 15 cycles by using liquid electrolyte. Therefore, in contrast with conventional liquid electrolyte, significantly enhanced cycling stability is achieved in combination with the use of GPE, which is predominantly derived from the absence of flooded air electrodes and the increase of oxygen diffusion, together with the suppression of the dendrite formationduring cycling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%